On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 09:04 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately it didn't reach the people it
> needs to, because for some reason you dropped them from Cc. Please could
> you check what caused your mailer to misbehave, and remedy that?
Btw, it also broke threadin
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 01:15 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> David Woodhouse writes:
>
> > If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
> > improvements we should make to it?
>
> Sure. Bugs #1017 and #1671 could be dealt with.
Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately it didn't
David Woodhouse writes:
> If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
> improvements we should make to it?
Sure. Bugs #1017 and #1671 could be dealt with.
There are some really nasty color artifacts on the display.
One must never do any sort of blending operation on non-lin
Thanks for a great explanation.
- Jim
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:26 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:22 -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
> > improvements we should make to it?
> >
> > Adam,
Thanks for the feedback, Adam.
--
dwmw2
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:22 -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
> improvements we should make to it?
>
> Adam, do I recall correctly that you had problems hooking it up to X for
> idle detection? Anything we could do to make that better
On 17/12/07 13:22 -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
> If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
> improvements we should make to it?
I remember that we really needed to synchronize the vsync with the GPU -
either generate the vsync externally and drive both components, or outpu
If we should design a next generation of DCON chip, are there any
improvements we should make to it?
Adam, do I recall correctly that you had problems hooking it up to X for
idle detection? Anything we could do to make that better?
--
dwmw2
___
Devel
