On 4/2/09, Mitch Bradley w...@laptop.org wrote:
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@laptop.org wrote:
It's nice to say they should see the light, but in my experience
talking
to many such companies, the fact of the matter is that it is a hard nut
for
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@laptop.org wrote:
that's the great thing about linux -- just when we finally
develop a standard way of doing things, someone steps in and
says, no, that was wrong, let's do it this way instead, and
stops supporting or improving the old way.
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@laptop.org wrote:
that's the great thing about linux -- just when we finally
develop a standard way of doing things, someone steps in and
says, no, that was wrong, let's do it this way instead, and
stops supporting
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@laptop.org wrote:
It's nice to say they should see the light, but in my experience talking
to many such companies, the fact of the matter is that it is a hard nut for
them to swallow.
I am under the impression that the relation between the OS
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@laptop.org wrote:
It's nice to say they should see the light, but in my experience talking
to many such companies, the fact of the matter is that it is a hard nut for
them to swallow.
I am under the
On Thursday 02 Apr 2009 8:21:27 pm Mitch Bradley wrote:
I guess the main disconnect is that, for the FOSS community, the point
of view is more important than the product. The commercial world is
just the opposite.
This is too broad a statement and rather unfair to those who have worked hard
that's the great thing about linux -- just when we finally
develop a standard way of doing things, someone steps in and
says, no, that was wrong, let's do it this way instead, and
stops supporting or improving the old way.
... and then people wonder why so many hardware companies don't want
