>
> I think you do not give enough credit to the work being done
> by Sugar
> Labs volunteers and local communities (given that
> appropriation of
> technology is almost a goal in
> itself). More developers are always
> welcome.
>
I can appreciate that this is a public list and the responses m
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:32 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
> And foolish me thought a few years ago that with a million+ machines
> in the field, under relatively common management, that there would
> be time & effort allocated to make those old machines run even more
> efficient software over time --
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:32 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
>> The outcome of our discussion was that we don't want this size
>> increase, not on any of our platforms. But actually we see it as a
>> significant downside for all small systems, not just ours. The wiki
>> page mentions 43mb growth - that wo
> The outcome of our discussion was that we don't want this size
> increase, not on any of our platforms. But actually we see it as a
> significant downside for all small systems, not just ours. The wiki
> page mentions 43mb growth - that would be really painful.
And foolish me thought a few years
