On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:42 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:35 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Delta-based storage is an implementation detail, certainly
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:35 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delta-based storage is an implementation detail, certainly possible (I
provided cites in the olpcfs page for how it would be done). I don't
explanation of the goals will help
more people comment on the efficacy of the solution.
Thanks,
Greg S
--
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:31:58 -0400
From: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mini-Conference Proposal
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:35 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Do you think that the POSIX API is very much tied to the underlying
implementation or should be discussed separately?
I have at least
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:53 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One major frustration with the existing datastore implementation is
that is unfriendly to legacy applications: you can't easily use the
command-line to browse through it, and you can't save a file from an
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:53 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More information: (draft) http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olpcfs
The thinking behind this is *excellent*.
If we make a couple of minor tweaks and we take that as the
description of the goals, then we can implement that, and
