Re: New faster build 2242

2008-08-03 Thread Deepak Saxena
On Aug 03 2008, at 21:07, Deepak Saxena was caught saying:
> On Aug 01 2008, at 23:57, C. Scott Ananian was caught saying:
> > 2008/8/1 Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2242
> > 
> > I've unretired the faster branch temporarily to collect some
> > measurements on the costs of adding xfce to our builds.  I also added
> > some patches from my local git to sugar-artwork for #7641 (fixing some
> > broken icons in xfce) and to sugar for #7495 and #7685 for my own
> > testing and development.
> 
> Can we separate the build numbers for faster and joyride builds since
> they are different build streams?
> 
> I just spent 5 minutes trying to figure out why "olpc-update joyride-2250"
> does not work before realizing that it was faster build. Not a lot
> of time wasted, but it seems confusing to me.

Nevermind, they are different stream numbers, just -EUSERERROR.

~Deepak

-- 
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: New faster build 2242

2008-08-03 Thread Deepak Saxena
On Aug 01 2008, at 23:57, C. Scott Ananian was caught saying:
> 2008/8/1 Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2242
> 
> I've unretired the faster branch temporarily to collect some
> measurements on the costs of adding xfce to our builds.  I also added
> some patches from my local git to sugar-artwork for #7641 (fixing some
> broken icons in xfce) and to sugar for #7495 and #7685 for my own
> testing and development.

Can we separate the build numbers for faster and joyride builds since
they are different build streams?

I just spent 5 minutes trying to figure out why "olpc-update joyride-2250"
does not work before realizing that it was faster build. Not a lot
of time wasted, but it seems confusing to me.

Tnx,
~Deepak

-- 
Deepak Saxena - Kernel Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: New faster build 2242

2008-08-01 Thread Chris Ball
Hi,

   > I've unretired the faster branch temporarily to collect some
   > measurements on the costs of adding xfce to our builds.

Could we see what the cost is to go to a full GNOME/nautilus, too?

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: New faster build 2242

2008-08-01 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:57 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/1 Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  I also added
> some patches from my local git to sugar-artwork for #7641 (fixing some
> broken icons in xfce) and to sugar for #7495 and #7685 for my own
> testing and development.

Sorry for getting your hopes up; these packages didn't actually land
in faster-2242; you'll have to wait for faster-2243.
 --scott

-- 
 ( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel


Re: New faster build 2242

2008-08-01 Thread C. Scott Ananian
2008/8/1 Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2242

I've unretired the faster branch temporarily to collect some
measurements on the costs of adding xfce to our builds.  I also added
some patches from my local git to sugar-artwork for #7641 (fixing some
broken icons in xfce) and to sugar for #7495 and #7685 for my own
testing and development.

You can safely ignore the faster branch, unless you are inordinately
curious, bored, or stalking me.  Or if you want to play around with a
sugar layout whose code involves the golden ratio, fibonacci numbers,
and sunflowers. ;-)
 --scott

p.s. 
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/cscott/sugar-tmp;a=blob;f=src/view/home/favoriteslayout.py;hb=HEAD#l292

-- 
 ( http://cscott.net/ )
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel