On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:26:41AM -0700, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote:
> I just noticed that the http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 page
> has not been updated with information about and pointing to the OS13
> build.
I've updated it. There's an OS14 available from April as well, but I've
not f
Steve,
I just noticed that the http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1 page has not
been updated with information about and pointing to the OS13 build.
Is this intentional?
By the way thank you for the builds.
Robert H.
rihowa...@gmail.com
On Mar 27, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Steven M. Parrish
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 00:46 -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> I've installed the 2010/03/22 XO-1 kernel on two os13 systems and on one
> 115-py system. Running those systems, I have seen no problems that I
> would think could be attributed to using this newest kernel. It is good
> enough for me --
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 15:51 -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Another question, if I may -- os13 comes with a 2010/03/13 XO-1 kernel
> (commit bfcaa33). Is it ok to install the newer 2010/03/22 XO-1 kernel
> (commit 3f93d90) in my os13 system ?
Please try and let me know. I froze on that version be
Thanks for explaining about os13 not using the Feb 2010 NetworkManager.
Another question, if I may -- os13 comes with a 2010/03/13 XO-1 kernel
(commit bfcaa33). Is it ok to install the newer 2010/03/22 XO-1 kernel
(commit 3f93d90) in my os13 system ?
mikus
__
hal wrote:
>
> ber...@codewiz.org said:
> > We'll deploy this to ~4000 kids really-soon-now. Bugs reported within 1-2
> > weeks have a chance of being fixed in time.
>
> os115 doesn't include powerd. Is your plan to ship it that way or do you
> want help testing suspend/resume?
given t
ber...@codewiz.org said:
> We'll deploy this to ~4000 kids really-soon-now. Bugs reported within 1-2
> weeks have a chance of being fixed in time.
os115 doesn't include powerd. Is your plan to ship it that way or do you
want help testing suspend/resume?
I ran it for a day or two before switch
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 17:01 -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Steven - your builds (as released) continue to leave out the entries
> for http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/f11/ and ../f11-xo1/ from
> /etc/yum.repos.d/ That has the effect of "freezing" the XO-1 services
> levels of your builds --
Steven - your builds (as released) continue to leave out the entries
for http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/f11/ and ../f11-xo1/ from
/etc/yum.repos.d/ That has the effect of "freezing" the XO-1 services
levels of your builds -- when potential newly-committed XO-1 rpms cannot
be applied on-the
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 10:12 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> Too many builds and only one XO-1 :-)
> Is there any priority?
We'll deploy this to ~4000 kids really-soon-now. Bugs reported within
1-2 weeks have a chance of being fixed in time.
> Is testing os115-py immediately applicable to
some way to get point to kernel headers, sources etc
--- On Sat, 3/27/10, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
> From: Steven M. Parrish
> Subject: New release of F11 for the XO-1 is available for testing - OS13
> To: "fedora-olpc-list" , "OLPC Devel"
> , &quo
Too many builds and only one XO-1 :-)
Is there any priority?
Is testing os115-py immediately applicable to os13 and vice versa?
--- On Sat, 3/27/10, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
> From: Steven M. Parrish
> Subject: New release of F11 for the XO-1 is available for testing - OS13
> To: &qu
OS13 is now available for testing.
It is available for download at http://people.sugarlabs.org/~smparrish
Installation instructions are here
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_XO-1#Installation_instructions
I want to thank everyone who has taken the time to test these releases. We
are getting
13 matches
Mail list logo
