Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Tomorrow I'll try to make sense of all this with the help of the other
> developers.
I didn't make much sense of it in the end, but somehow I managed to
test the kernel on both B2 and B3 and it seems to be working fine.
Coming soon with a new candidate patch integrati
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
>
>> Two comments inline - this looks good to me, but i'll need to apply it
>> to see whats up with GX. Next step is to toss it into the playground,
>> I guess to get some miles on it before Andres pulls it in.
It turns out that the security syst
Jordan Crouse wrote:
> Two comments inline - this looks good to me, but i'll need to apply it
> to see whats up with GX. Next step is to toss it into the playground,
> I guess to get some miles on it before Andres pulls it in.
Normally I'd do that, especially for such an invasive patch.
But eve
Two comments inline - this looks good to me, but i'll need to apply it
to see whats up with GX. Next step is to toss it into the playground,
I guess to get some miles on it before Andres pulls it in.
On 19/09/07 18:59 -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbmem.c b/driver
Here's a proposed patch for the green icons bug. I'm afraid it came
up a bit long and somewhat invasive.
Tested on B4: OK!
Tested on B2: KO (does not unfreeze the screen when Sugar comes up)
I must have broken something in the GX part when I merged the two powerup()
and powerdown() functions, bu
