Hi Scott,
Good catch. We did talk about the question of marking bugs. Sorry I
missed that in my notes.
I think it was agreed that we talk about those in the weekly software
status meeting. Also, that bugs which are considered blockers should
have the keyword: blocks:8.2.0
This is documented
Hi All,
Marco, Greg, Kim, Joe, Paul, Eben, Chris, Scott, Jim, Denis, Michael and
others people met on Tuesday July 1 at 2PM US ET via IRC, phone and in
person.
Sorry for the long e-mail but it was a very productive meeting and I
want to keep everyone in the loop.
Agenda is at:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We talked about what this page offers that we don't already have. The
conclusion was that its a high level view of the main features in the
release. Each item on this page should include a list of relevant bug id
that give the
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Kim will check with Peru and Greg will check with Uruguay teams to
ensure that they do not plan to upgrade to 8.2.0. Action item due by
July 20.
Why don't we want them to use 8.2?
I suspect some words were left out, and
My thoughts in-line...
Kim
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:16 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Kim will check with Peru and Greg will check with Uruguay teams to
ensure that they do not plan to upgrade to 8.2.0.
