Re: Rhel
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_BuilderHas the details From: Peter RobinsonSent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 12:36To: Daniel NarvaezCc: Gonzalo Odiard; OLPC DevelopmentSubject: Re: RhelOn Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:> oob = ? :)olpc-os-builder> On 18 December 2013 16:55, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:>>>> oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing>> dependencies...>>>> Gonzalo>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson >> wrote:>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail>>> wrote:>>> >>>> > I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's>>> > an>>> > rhel dude.>>> >>>> > Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this>>> > o/s?>>> > If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy?>>> >>>> > Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and>>> > based>>> > on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic.>>>>>> kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but>>> it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies.>>> If he's a "RHEL dude" he should be able to get his head around using>>> Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19.>>>>>> Peter>>> ___>>> Devel mailing list>>> Devel@lists.laptop.org>>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel>>>>>>>> ___>> Devel mailing list>> Devel@lists.laptop.org>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel>>>>>> --> Daniel Narvaez___Devel mailing listDevel@lists.laptop.orghttp://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > oob = ? :) olpc-os-builder > On 18 December 2013 16:55, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> >> oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing >> dependencies... >> >> Gonzalo >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson >> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's >>> > an >>> > rhel dude. >>> > >>> > Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this >>> > o/s? >>> > If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? >>> > >>> > Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and >>> > based >>> > on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. >>> >>> kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but >>> it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. >>> If he's a "RHEL dude" he should be able to get his head around using >>> Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. >>> >>> Peter >>> ___ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel@lists.laptop.org >>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >> >> >> >> ___ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel@lists.laptop.org >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >> > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
oob = ? :) On 18 December 2013 16:55, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing > dependencies... > > Gonzalo > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail >> wrote: >> > >> > I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's >> an >> > rhel dude. >> > >> > Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this >> o/s? >> > If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? >> > >> > Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and >> based >> > on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. >> >> kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but >> it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. >> If he's a "RHEL dude" he should be able to get his head around using >> Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. >> >> Peter >> ___ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel@lists.laptop.org >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >> > > > ___ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies... Because RHEL doesn't ship with all the packages that Fedora does. We might be OK, I've not checked. Peter > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail >> wrote: >> > >> > I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's >> > an >> > rhel dude. >> > >> > Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this >> > o/s? >> > If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? >> > >> > Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and >> > based >> > on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. >> >> kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but >> it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. >> If he's a "RHEL dude" he should be able to get his head around using >> Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. >> >> Peter >> ___ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel@lists.laptop.org >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
oob works with F18, then I don't know why would have missing dependencies... Gonzalo On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail > wrote: > > > > I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's > an > > rhel dude. > > > > Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this > o/s? > > If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? > > > > Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and > based > > on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. > > kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but > it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. > If he's a "RHEL dude" he should be able to get his head around using > Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. > > Peter > ___ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Rhel
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kevin Gordon Gmail wrote: > > I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an > rhel dude. > > Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? > If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy? > > Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based > on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic. kernel is 3.10 and the process should mostly be the same as Fedora but it's likely that it won't actually have all the needed dependencies. If he's a "RHEL dude" he should be able to get his head around using Fedora given RHEL-7 beta is derived from Fedora 19. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Rhel
I have a lead on someone to help in testing and building. However, he's an rhel dude.Does anyone have experience in doing oob, and/or loading sugar on this o/s? If so, any hints, pitfalls, or should the usual yum installs be happy?Supposedly the release of rhel he's using now is public beta of v7 and based on fc19, kernel 3.1, which might or might not be problematic.Thanks. KG ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
