Jordan Crouse wrote:
>
>> Jordan,
>>
>> I remember you mentioned that reading PM1_STS might be unreliable...
>> Can you shed more light into the issue?
>>
>
> Hmm - I don't remember that. PM1_STS should be reliable at this point,
> assuming nobody has touched it since we resumed.
>
I t
On 07/07/07 16:07 -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I was reading olpc-pm.c while I stumbled across this code
> >
> >
> > static int olpc_pm_interrupt(int irq, void *id)
> > {
> > uint32_t sts, gpe = 0;
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was reading olpc-pm.c while I stumbled across this code
>
>
> static int olpc_pm_interrupt(int irq, void *id)
> {
> uint32_t sts, gpe = 0;
>
> sts = inl(acpi_base + PM1_STS);
> outl(sts |
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:35:01PM -0400, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was reading olpc-pm.c while I stumbled across this code
>
>
> static int olpc_pm_interrupt(int irq, void *id)
> {
> uint32_t sts, gpe = 0;
>
> sts = inl(acpi_base + PM1_STS);
> outl(sts |
Hi folks,
I was reading olpc-pm.c while I stumbled across this code
static int olpc_pm_interrupt(int irq, void *id)
{
uint32_t sts, gpe = 0;
sts = inl(acpi_base + PM1_STS);
outl(sts | 0x, acpi_base + PM1_STS);
if (olpc_get_rev() >= OLPC_REV_B2) {
