On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 04:42:48PM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for all the feedback on my questions about what it would take to
run a slimmed down Fedora 10 on the XO NAND.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-December/msg00022.html
To reiterate, the goal
greg wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for all the feedback on my questions about what it would take to
run a slimmed down Fedora 10 on the XO NAND.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-December/msg00022.html
To reiterate, the goal is one distribution with two Desktop
Hi,
(but seriously: we only need to add to what we have -- we don't
need to start from scratch, rebuilding and/or subtracting from
fedora.)
In particular, I think:
* take a Joyride build
* yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop Environment
*
All,
Thanks for all the feedback on my questions about what it would take to
run a slimmed down Fedora 10 on the XO NAND.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-December/msg00022.html
To reiterate, the goal is one distribution with two Desktop Environments
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:56:47PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
(but seriously: we only need to add to what we have -- we don't
need to start from scratch, rebuilding and/or subtracting from
fedora.)
In particular, I think:
* take a Joyride build
* yum groupinstall
On 16.12.2008, at 18:56, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
(but seriously: we only need to add to what we have -- we don't
need to start from scratch, rebuilding and/or subtracting from
fedora.)
In particular, I think:
* take a Joyride build
* yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop Environment
*
Hi,
* yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop Environment
I gave this a try with latest Joyride (2592), and get a couple of
depsolving problems. Maybe one of the RPM ninjas on fedora-olpc-list
could take a look at how we could resolve these? Alternatively, maybe
we should be hand-picking the list
Hi,
* yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop Environment
I gave this a try with latest Joyride (2592), and get a couple of
depsolving problems. Maybe one of the RPM ninjas on fedora-olpc-list
could take a look at how we could resolve these? Alternatively, maybe
we should be hand-picking the
Hi Paul,
I mean slimmed down Fedora (probably shouldn't even call it Fedora at that
point) plus Gnome, KDE of XFCE window manager. Is that precise enough?
If its as easy as yum install gnome on top of 8.2.0 image, that would be
great!
It should be that simple with some caveats. well
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Erik Garrison e...@laptop.org wrote:
I have been quite frustrated with the Fedora toolset in this regard.
Getting a bare minimum of functionality is not something which these
tools are
The hard part will come when we need to pick the bare minimum set of
functionality. I especially want to know what additional
libraries/RPMs/features we need to install beyond what we alrady have in
XO 8.2.0.
I have been quite frustrated with the Fedora toolset in this regard.
Getting a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:32:58AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
The hard part will come when we need to pick the bare minimum set of
functionality. I especially want to know what additional
libraries/RPMs/features we need to install beyond what we alrady have in
XO 8.2.0.
I have been
Hi All,
Thanks for all the feedback on my questions about what it would take to
run a slimmed down Fedora 10 on the XO NAND.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-December/msg00022.html
To reiterate, the goal is one distribution with two Desktop Environments
(Sugar and one
13 matches
Mail list logo
