On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:59 AM, John Watlington wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:24 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
>
> >> We should test the calibration again.
> > Walter, Guzman
> >
> > Testing with TA140
> >
> > It looks like the 1.75 audio circuit was changed between the
> preproduction an
Wad,
thanks,
Tony
>
> On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:24 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
>
> >> We should test the calibration again.
> > Walter, Guzman
> >
> > Testing with TA140
> >
> > It looks like the 1.75 audio circuit was changed between the preproduction
> > and the ramp unit 1.75's
> >
> >
On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:24 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
>> We should test the calibration again.
> Walter, Guzman
>
> Testing with TA140
>
> It looks like the 1.75 audio circuit was changed between the preproduction
> and the ramp unit 1.75's
>
> Testing on SKU199 and SKU204, the impedance
James
I think I have eliminated software differences.
Both laptops reflashed to OS8 (12.1.0)
Turtle Blocks V141 ( a new version is just released)
Phono plug with left-right-ground all shorted
forever print voltage displays:
0VSKU199
-1.3V SKU204
Tony
__
Thanks
> > The turtle code is forever print voltage
>
> Could you please explain how to do this? I've not used Turtle Art, so
> don't presume any foreknowledge.
look at the blocks submenu, the 4th item from the left in the main menu
look at the 'flow operators' pallette the 5th item in the subm
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:36:08PM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> > > Testing on SKU199 and SKU204, the impedance has gone from 1k to 4k
> > > and the calibration is all wrong on 204
> >
> > Possibility of damage? How are you measuring this, so that I can
> > reproduce on units that I be
> > Testing on SKU199 and SKU204, the impedance has gone from 1k to 4k
> > and the calibration is all wrong on 204
>
> Possibility of damage? How are you measuring this, so that I can
> reproduce on units that I believe are undamaged?
>
> Are you measuring DC impedance with laptop power off, or
Thanks for testing, this sounds interesting.
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:24:45AM +1000, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> > We should test the calibration again.
> Walter, Guzman
>
> Testing with TA140
>
> It looks like the 1.75 audio circuit was changed between the
> preproduction and the ramp un
> We should test the calibration again.
Walter, Guzman
Testing with TA140
It looks like the 1.75 audio circuit was changed between the preproduction and
the ramp unit 1.75's
Testing on SKU199 and SKU204, the impedance has gone from 1k to 4k and the
calibration is all wrong on 204
(TA calibrat