On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:04 AM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm personally pretty involved in
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 8:13 AM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:04 AM,
John Watlington wrote:
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:24 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:04 AM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Sameer Verma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for jumping in the middle of this thread, but I is the
consideration for different SoC types based on being able to run Windows
at some point in time? What if Gen2 has an architecture that doesn't run
Windows?
Edward Cherlin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Sameer Verma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for jumping in the middle of this thread, but I is the
consideration for different SoC types based on being able to run Windows
at some point in time? What if Gen2 has an architecture
