Installed 698 (using 'olpc-update' from Joyride). There was __no__
Terminal activity anywhere (that I could find) in the newly
installed 698 image.
I happen to *require* using the command line to set my environment.
After boot, had to use a console terminal just to see what was what.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Installed 698 (using 'olpc-update' from Joyride). There was __no__
Terminal activity anywhere (that I could find) in the newly
installed 698 image.
Yes, sorry, things have slightly fallen through the cracks. The
Terminal, Log Viewer, and Analyze are not included in the core build,
but they *are* included in the core *library*. That is, you can
always install them, even though they may not show up by default in
the toolbar.
I did not realize that - your answer settles my concern (i.e., that
a user
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terminal, Log Viewer, and Analyze are not included in the core build,
but they *are* included in the core *library*. That is, you can
always install them, even though they may not show up by default in
the
Was not aware of the implications of the official builds from now
on will contain only _base_ Activities (discussed in Ticket #6598),
until I saw a recent post to the Sugar list.
I happen to be a heavy CLI user. It appears the target countries
for OLPC deployment have not insisted on CLI -
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was not aware of the implications of the official builds from now
on will contain only _base_ Activities (discussed in Ticket #6598),
until I saw a recent post to the Sugar list.
I happen to be a heavy CLI user. It
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:39 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was not aware of the implications of the official builds from now
on will contain only _base_ Activities (discussed in Ticket #6598),
Yes, this was one of the aspects we like about the new design. Your
suggestion reinforces the whole intent of the two views within Home.
Regardless, we likely want to retain their presence within the Library so
that kids can manage (including deletion of) activities without winding up
entirely
On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:48 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
We cannot ship laptops with learning tools, of which the terminal is
one.
ITYM without? :)
--
Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://radian.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This whole discussion has gone awry. The presumed core activities
had better be about streamlining the build engineering process, not
the epistemological goals of the project. We cannot ship laptops with[out]
learning
Terminal, Log Viewer, and Analyze are not included in the core build,
but they *are* included in the core *library*. That is, you can
always install them, even though they may not show up by default in
the toolbar.
Why would we burn up Flash space for activities that are not accessible
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:22 PM, John Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would we burn up Flash space for activities that are not accessible
to the user?* And if the user installs them, then they burn up twice as
much flash space?
Taking up twice as much flash space is painful. Having a
12 matches
Mail list logo
