>> I'm not sure if it was considered, but as the maintainer of swfdec in
>> Fedora I can state that swfdec is very cpu-intensive, and I have my
>> doubts whether the performance on the XO would be comparable to gnash's,
>> though it might be worth investigating.
>
> That has been my experience too,
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
> Quick clarification. We discussed making swfdec installed by default
> during the development of Fedora 9, but decided against doing so since
> we felt it wasn't quite ready for that.
>
Ah, thanks for the clarification, I don't run Fedora so
>> swfdec{,-mozilla} use gstreamer, are LGPLed, and support most of the
>> Flash 9 features whereas gnash supports only a few of the Flash 9
>> features. swfdec is also the default Flash player on Fedora, and is
>> the preferred flash player on Ubuntu.
>
> Quick clarification. We discussed making
On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> swfdec{,-mozilla} use gstreamer, are LGPLed, and support most of the
> Flash 9 features whereas gnash supports only a few of the Flash 9
> features. swfdec is also the default Flash player on Fedora, and is
> the preferred flash player on
Hello everyone,
(top-posting due to tangent nature of discussion)
Just a thought here, in my experience, swfdec[1] works far better than
gnash for flash websites; why not use that? There's a Firefox/Gecko
plugin called swfdec-mozilla which works beautifully.
swfdec{,-mozilla} use gstreamer, are L
