On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 01:21:23AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> That was/is a $15 Transcend 4GB class 6 card that not only can have 5
> erase blocks open but also has an impressive random w/r speed (full
> flashbence data is attached)
Okay, thanks. I don't know a deployment willing to fo
--- On Thu, 4/14/11, James Cameron wrote:
> From: James Cameron
> Subject: Re: XO-1.75 RAM
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: devel@lists.laptop.org
> Date: Thursday, April 14, 2011, 3:33 AM
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:01:47AM
> -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:01:47AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> For what it worths I have the same SDcard on the XO-1 with more than
> 1500 hours of swap use of a 256MB partition, with no problem so far.
Cool. What was the unit cost of the SD card, what size was it, and how
many writes w
> --
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:36:10 +1000
> From: Sridhar Dhanapalan
> Subject: Re: XO-1.75 RAM
> To: mi...@bga.com
> Cc: OLPC Devel
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 14 April
On 14 April 2011 06:16, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Unless the RAM chips on the XO-1.75 are socketed (and thus easily
> replaceable),
This seems unlikely. Socketing adds cost up front, and low cost is a
primary goal. Also the demand for upgrade would be relatively low.
> ... particularly memory-
On 14 April 2011 06:16, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
>> Might 1GB of RAM become a performance bottleneck?
>
> I myself am skeptical of efforts to use the OLPC where a desktop system
> might be more effective. I've run various large applications on an XO-1.5
> system, and have not myself experienced "m
> Might 1GB of RAM become a performance bottleneck?
I myself am skeptical of efforts to use the OLPC where a desktop system
might be more effective. I've run various large applications on an
XO-1.5 system, and have not myself experienced "memory shortage".
Unless the RAM chips on the XO-1.75
On 14 April 2011 02:21, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
> wrote:
>> According to http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-1.75 the XO-1.75 will have
>> 1GB of RAM
>
> That's... not quite the plan of record :-)
>
> I followed your link but could not find any such
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> According to http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-1.75 the XO-1.75 will have
> 1GB of RAM
That's... not quite the plan of record :-)
I followed your link but could not find any such statement... where
does it say so, so I can fix it?
regards
According to http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-1.75 the XO-1.75 will have
1GB of RAM. This is the same amount as in the XO-1.5. Might this
become a performance bottleneck? Might there be an option to purchase
units with more RAM?
Sridhar
___
Devel mailing lis
10 matches
Mail list logo