gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 19:54 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: In update.1 we shipped the DBus version of gnome-vfs2 (Nokia patches) which didn't bring ORBit in. I'm not sure if that's still the case in joyride. I looked at the OLPC-2 gnome-vfs2 spec file and I don't see what you mean here. The only obvious difference is that we changed the GConf requires to GConf2-dbus. Did you mean GConf here? I guess GConf2-dbus provides an equivalent interface to the GConf2 package and hence is a drop-in replacement. Do we want do to the same for 8.2? ORBit2 is shipped in update1 and 8.2 as well. Switching to GConf2-dbus won't cause it to go away since it is needed by gnome-python2-gnomevfs. Thanks, Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:00 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: I guess GConf2-dbus provides an equivalent interface to the GConf2 package and hence is a drop-in replacement. Oh ok, that make sense and I guess it's the case here... So do we want to use GConf2-dbus like we did for update1, or are we ok to stick with plain old GConf2 in 8.2? ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:00 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: I guess GConf2-dbus provides an equivalent interface to the GConf2 package and hence is a drop-in replacement. Oh ok, that make sense and I guess it's the case here... So do we want to use GConf2-dbus like we did for update1, or are we ok to stick with plain old GConf2 in 8.2? I'm not sure. The reason people didn't want plain GConf in the build was the ORBit dependency. Now I'm not sure if the problem there was disk space, memory or what else. I guess we should measure... Or we can ask Jim, I think he was one of the ORBit haters :) Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:28 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote: The bonobo-activation-server likes to chew up 40mb (of RAM), for doing almost nothing. ORBit doesn't appear to depend on any bonobo components. And we've successfully kicked bonobo out of the build. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:28 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote: The bonobo-activation-server likes to chew up 40mb (of RAM), for doing almost nothing. ORBit doesn't appear to depend on any bonobo components. And we've successfully kicked bonobo out of the build. It's bonobo that depends on ORBit, I guess the fear here is that, as bonobo, GConf might use a lot of memory because of ORBit. It should not be hard to measure. Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
In general, gnome is moving away from Bonobo/Orbit toward dbus based messaging. - Jim On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:09 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:28 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote: The bonobo-activation-server likes to chew up 40mb (of RAM), for doing almost nothing. ORBit doesn't appear to depend on any bonobo components. And we've successfully kicked bonobo out of the build. It's bonobo that depends on ORBit, I guess the fear here is that, as bonobo, GConf might use a lot of memory because of ORBit. It should not be hard to measure. Marco -- Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] One Laptop Per Child ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In general, gnome is moving away from Bonobo/Orbit toward dbus based messaging. Yeah, there is no plan yet (that I know of) to replace GConf with something dbus based though :( Marco ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: gnome-vfs2 / GConf2 / dbus
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:25 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In general, gnome is moving away from Bonobo/Orbit toward dbus based messaging. Yeah, there is no plan yet (that I know of) to replace GConf with something dbus based though :( Dunno current plans... There does seem to be code http://developer.imendio.com/projects/misc/gconf-dbus - Jim Marco -- Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] One Laptop Per Child ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
