On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 17:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 04:12 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
As I mentioned, that's more realistic once the initrd can associate to
an AP-based wireless and get its lease
2009/7/24 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
Sorry about the long delay. Just reviewed your code in the
dracut-modules-olpc package. Looks good.
Question: can you build initrds on F9 with dracut? Or did you port
your patches from an oldstyle olpcrd-rootskel? Deployments using
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 17:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 04:12 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
As I mentioned, that's more realistic once the initrd can associate to
an AP-based wireless and get its lease there.
OK, so would you change your mind if that was the case? :)
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your recent work on olpc-update. I'd like to propose a few
changes though:
1. I think that checking for new leases every 15 minutes when expiry is
near is too much. It will simply put too much load on any server that
has to handle a lot of laptops when there are no new
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Draked...@laptop.org wrote:
Thanks for your recent work on olpc-update. I'd like to propose a few
changes though:
Thanks for the review!
1. I think that checking for new leases every 15 minutes when expiry is
near is too much. It will simply put too
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 04:12 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
As I mentioned, that's more realistic once the initrd can associate to
an AP-based wireless and get its lease there.
OK, so would you change your mind if that was the case? :)
I already wrote that code and it is deployed in Paraguay.
martin.langh...@gmail.com said:
As I mentioned, that's more realistic once the initrd can associate to
an AP-based wireless and get its lease there.
Let's get lease-requests working on an AP-controlled network. Once
that works, then we can relax the request eagerness if desired. And
hell,
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 12:43 -0700, Hal Murray wrote:
What's the current status of the NetworkManager tangle?
The old/released stuff (802) wasn't very happy with APs.
This is unrelated, we're talking about the initramfs. Feel free to start
another topic with a more detailed report of your
