>
> Finally, tests in wireless should be performed with update-1.706+
Preferably update.1-708
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:41 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> what do people think about the idea of making the existance of established
>>> TCP connections inhibit sleep?
>>
>> What release are you running
> (when booted with the o gamekey held down also shows build 656 (which I
> know didn't have auto-suspend enabled) both with kernel
> 2.6.22.20071231*3a269
>
> so now I'm as puzzled as you are.
If you were displaying a PDF file in another window, a gross kludge in
Read might have forcibly suspe
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Morgan Collett wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:42 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what do people think about the idea of making the existance
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Richard A. Smith wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what do people think about the idea of making the existance of
> established
> TCP co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what do people think about the idea of making the existance of established
TCP connections inhibit sleep?
>>> What release are you running?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:42 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what do people think about the idea of making the existance of established
TCP connections inhibit sleep?
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> what do people think about the idea of making the existance of established
>>> TCP connections inhibit sleep?
>>
>> What release are you running? Auto-suspend isn't enabled in
> The real fix is to only force a suspend when the kernel knows no
> process is scheduled to run now or soon, and to waken in less than a
> whole second.
I'm just a user, exercising whatever functions have been made
available in Joyride. [I manually 'touch/rm' the various inhibit
files in /etc/
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> what do people think about the idea of making the existance of established
>> TCP connections inhibit sleep?
>
> What release are you running? Auto-suspend isn't enabled in production
> releases.
>
> Joyride should be awak
> what do people think about the idea of making the existance of established
> TCP connections inhibit sleep?
What release are you running? Auto-suspend isn't enabled in production
releases.
Joyride should be awakened from suspend by any received unicast (TCP) packet,
so I'm not sure why you s
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 08:32 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just attempted to do an upgrade of one of my machines, and I ran into
> the problem that if I just kicked off the upgrade and let it sit, it went
> to sleep in the middle and died.
This specific issue was fixed quite a while ago, II
I just attempted to do an upgrade of one of my machines, and I ran into
the problem that if I just kicked off the upgrade and let it sit, it went
to sleep in the middle and died.
what do people think about the idea of making the existance of established
TCP connections inhibit sleep?
unfortuna
13 matches
Mail list logo
