On 5/20/24 6:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:29:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
It still can have only one useful value ("iptables"), but once a 2nd
value is supported, it will be selectable by setting
"firewall_backend=nftables" in /etc/libvirt/network.conf.
If
On 5/20/24 5:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:29:37PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
V4:
https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/HX3RDEIQYJ6IOS2TDQANFKCKAXJMKCJN/#HX3RDEIQYJ6IOS2TDQANFKCKAXJMKCJN
V3:
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 14:48:47 +, Efim Shevrin via Devel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > If vmdisk is NULL, shouldn't this function (qemuSnapshotDeleteValidate())
> > return an error?
>
> I think this qemuSnapshotDeleteValidate should not return an error.
>
> It seems to me that when vmdisk is
Hello,
> If vmdisk is NULL, shouldn't this function (qemuSnapshotDeleteValidate())
> return an error?
I think this qemuSnapshotDeleteValidate should not return an error.
It seems to me that when vmdisk is NULL, this does not invalidate
the snapshot itself, but indicates that the config has
Move the word 'Checking' into the appropriate formatting strings and
mark all outstanding ones for translation.
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/637
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
---
tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c | 2 +-
tools/virt-host-validate-ch.c | 2 +-
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:29:49PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> It still can have only one useful value ("iptables"), but once a 2nd
> value is supported, it will be selectable by setting
> "firewall_backend=nftables" in /etc/libvirt/network.conf.
>
> If firewall_backend isn't set in network.conf,
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:29:37PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> V4:
> https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/HX3RDEIQYJ6IOS2TDQANFKCKAXJMKCJN/#HX3RDEIQYJ6IOS2TDQANFKCKAXJMKCJN
> V3:
>
We are getting close to 10.4.0 release of libvirt. To aim for the
release on Monday 03 Jun I suggest entering the freeze on Tuesday 28
May and tagging RC2 on Thursday 30 May.
I hope this works for everyone.
Jirka
On 4/29/24 14:43, Fima Shevrin via Devel wrote:
> When creating a snapshot of a VM with multiple hard disks,
> the snapshot takes into account the presence of all disks
> in the system. If, over time, one of the disks is deleted,
> the snapshot will continue to store knowledge of the deleted disk.
We should return the full filename path when we don't have a match on
the third group of the regex.
Signed-off-by: David Negreira
---
src/logging/log_cleaner.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/logging/log_cleaner.c b/src/logging/log_cleaner.c
index
Hello Michael and Peter,
Exactly, not so compelling, as I did it first only on servers widely
used for production in our data center. The network adapters are
Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries NetXtreme BCM5720
2-port Gigabit Ethernet PCIe
InfiniBand controller: Mellanox
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:33:58PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:33:58 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tests: add testing of parameter=1 for SMP topology
>
> Validate that it is possible to pass 'parameter=1' for any SMP topology
>
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:33:57 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any
> machine
>
> This effectively reverts
>
> commit
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 18:06:56 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any
> machine
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:49:40AM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > >
On 5/13/2024 8:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Validate that it is possible to pass 'parameter=1' for any SMP topology
parameter, since unsupported parameters are implicitly considered to
always have a value of 1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
---
tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 8
Please ignore this, forgot to add v2 in `git-send-email`
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 15:41, Abhiram Tilak wrote:
> The current way of updating a network configuration uses `virsh
> net-update` to add, delete or modify entries. But with such a mechansim
> one should know if an entry with current info
The current way of updating a network configuration uses `virsh
net-update` to add, delete or modify entries. But with such a mechansim
one should know if an entry with current info already exists. Adding
modify-or-add option automatically performs either modify or add
depending on the current
The current way of updating a network configuration uses `virsh
net-update` to add, delete or modify entries. But with such a mechansim
one should know if an entry with current info already exists. Adding
modify-or-add option automatically performs either modify or add
depending on the current
On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 18:33, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 01:43:52AM +0530, Abhiram Tilak wrote:
> >The current way of updating a network configuration uses `virsh
> >net-update` to add, delete or modify entries. But with such a mechansim
> >one should know if an entry
Alright. I will check it out.
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 12:03, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 20:37:53 +0530, Abhiram Tilak wrote:
> > Adds documentation for the element to
> > the libvirt snapshot format XML reference. The
>
> > element, introduced at commit 565bcb5d79, ensures
Hello Peter and all,
I did a comparison of the VM live-migration speeds between RDMA and
TCP/IP on our servers
and plotted the results to get an initial impression. Unfortunately,
the Ethernet NICs are not the
recent ones, therefore, it may not make much sense. I can do it on
servers with more
21 matches
Mail list logo
