On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 01:57:51PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:58:06 +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 12:44 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:30:24 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:25:55 +0100,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:58:06 +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 12:44 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:30:24 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:25:55 +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > > > meson's "test()" function provides a "sh
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 12:44 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:30:24 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:25:55 +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > > meson's "test()" function provides a "should_fail: bool" argument
> > > that
> > > checks for a command to exi
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:30:24 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:25:55 +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > meson's "test()" function provides a "should_fail: bool" argument that
> > checks for a command to exit with a non-zero exit code instead of the usual
> > zero exit code t
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:25:55 +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> meson's "test()" function provides a "should_fail: bool" argument that
> checks for a command to exit with a non-zero exit code instead of the usual
> zero exit code to signal success. If the program under test does so, it is
> recorde
meson's "test()" function provides a "should_fail: bool" argument that
checks for a command to exit with a non-zero exit code instead of the usual
zero exit code to signal success. If the program under test does so, it is
recorded as "EXPECTEDFAIL" instead of "OK". While there is an argument to be
