On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 03:10:55PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 04:02:46PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 19:42:42 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > The auto shutdown code can currently only perform managed save,
> > > which may fail in som
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 19:42:42 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The auto shutdown code can currently only perform managed save,
> which may fail in some cases, for example when PCI devices are
> assigned. On failure, shutdown inhibitors remain in place which
> may be undesirable.
>
> This expa
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 15:10:55 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 04:02:46PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 19:42:42 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > The auto shutdown code can currently only perform managed save,
> > > which may fail in some
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 04:02:46PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 19:42:42 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The auto shutdown code can currently only perform managed save,
> > which may fail in some cases, for example when PCI devices are
> > assigned. On failure, shutdown
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 19:42:42 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The auto shutdown code can currently only perform managed save,
> which may fail in some cases, for example when PCI devices are
> assigned. On failure, shutdown inhibitors remain in place which
> may be undesirable.
>
> This expa
The auto shutdown code can currently only perform managed save,
which may fail in some cases, for example when PCI devices are
assigned. On failure, shutdown inhibitors remain in place which
may be undesirable.
This expands the logic to try a sequence of operations
* Managed save
* Graceful shu
