On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 11:57:49AM GMT, lixianglai wrote:
> Hi Andrea:
> > We have a non-trivial amount of architecture-specific logic
> > dealing with TPM, so it's good to have coverage for it.
> >
> > Note that two architectures currently don't have support for
> > TPM devices enabled by default
Hi Andrea:
We have a non-trivial amount of architecture-specific logic
dealing with TPM, so it's good to have coverage for it.
Note that two architectures currently don't have support for
TPM devices enabled by default in QEMU: loongarch64 and s390x.
The situation might change for the former, bu
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 19:01:59 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> We have a non-trivial amount of architecture-specific logic
> dealing with TPM, so it's good to have coverage for it.
>
> Note that two architectures currently don't have support for
> TPM devices enabled by default in QEMU: loongar
We have a non-trivial amount of architecture-specific logic
dealing with TPM, so it's good to have coverage for it.
Note that two architectures currently don't have support for
TPM devices enabled by default in QEMU: loongarch64 and s390x.
The situation might change for the former, but that's unli
