Hi,
reflash:(you still need UrJtag installed in your system)
> we added autodown images to "reflash_m1.sh" so just download and execute it
> http://www.milkymist.org/snapshots/2011-04-22/reflash_m1.sh
>
>
>From your script, if I don't use JTAG/Serial cable, it should show:
echo "there are er
> Ok, then let's not spend undue amounts of time on this minor issue and
> just use a notch in the top acrylic plate. Faster and less risky.
I think that looks quite ugly.
Just wait a little we are trying to do a bit more investigation, you
don't need to do anything. The options are all quite cle
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:17 +0800, Adam Wang wrote:
> the retention type one needs a new footprint.
Ok, then let's not spend undue amounts of time on this minor issue and
just use a notch in the top acrylic plate. Faster and less risky.
S.
___
http://
Although I've already mentioned there are absolutely no problems with a
VIPT mmu/cache design under the cache-size assumption Sebastien worked
with, there is *also* no problem with exceeding this cache-size
restriction for an operating system like linux. I'll explain why below.
On 25/04/11 07:
On 23/04/11 12:55 PM, Sebastien Bourdeauducq wrote:
b) Use a simple cache with cache associativity * page size = cache size.
Advantages: simple hardware, and solves above problems.
Half the point of the LM32 is the sweet-spot in speed/size that it hits.
This approach to an MMU lives at a similar
