Re: [OMPI devel] Removing the oob/ud component

2018-06-19 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via devel
Oob/tcp should likely be good enough.

Do you want to force the two and see if there's noticeable difference for you?

mpirun --mca oob tcp ...
mpirun --mca oob ud ...



> On Jun 19, 2018, at 6:14 PM, Ben Menadue  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> What’s the replacement that it should use instead? I’m pretty sure oob/ud is 
> being picked by default on our IB cluster. Or is oob/tcp good enough?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 
>> On 20 Jun 2018, at 5:20 am, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via devel 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> We talked about this on the webex today, but for those of you who weren't 
>> there: we're talking about removing the oob/ud component:
>> 
>>   https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/5300
>> 
>> We couldn't find anyone who still cares about this component (e.g., LANL, 
>> Mellanox, ...etc.), and no one is maintaining it.  If no one says anything 
>> within the next 2 weeks, we'll remove oob/ud before the branch for v4.0.0.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>> 
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com

___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [OMPI devel] Removing the oob/ud component

2018-06-19 Thread Ben Menadue
Hi Jeff,

What’s the replacement that it should use instead? I’m pretty sure oob/ud is 
being picked by default on our IB cluster. Or is oob/tcp good enough?

Cheers,
Ben

> On 20 Jun 2018, at 5:20 am, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via devel 
>  wrote:
> 
> We talked about this on the webex today, but for those of you who weren't 
> there: we're talking about removing the oob/ud component:
> 
>https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/5300
> 
> We couldn't find anyone who still cares about this component (e.g., LANL, 
> Mellanox, ...etc.), and no one is maintaining it.  If no one says anything 
> within the next 2 weeks, we'll remove oob/ud before the branch for v4.0.0.
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[OMPI devel] Removing the oob/ud component

2018-06-19 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via devel
We talked about this on the webex today, but for those of you who weren't 
there: we're talking about removing the oob/ud component:

https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/5300

We couldn't find anyone who still cares about this component (e.g., LANL, 
Mellanox, ...etc.), and no one is maintaining it.  If no one says anything 
within the next 2 weeks, we'll remove oob/ud before the branch for v4.0.0.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com

___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel