Steve Wise wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 13:57 -0400, Andrew Friedley wrote:
Steve Wise wrote:
Well I've tried OMPI on ofed-1.2 udapl today and it doesn't work. I'm
debugging now.
Here's part of the problem (from ompi/btl/udapl/btl_udapl.c):
/* TODO - big bad evil hack
Hi all -
As was discussed on the telecon a couple of weeks ago, to try to
lower the maintenance cost of the build system, starting this
Saturday Autoconf 2.60 and Automake 1.10 will be required to
successfully run autogen.sh on the trunk. As I mentioned in a
previous e-mail, the required
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 12:55 -0700, Arlin Davis wrote:
> Steve Wise wrote:
>
> >1) OMPI shouldn't be stepping on the ia_address.
> >
> >
> stongly agree
>
> >2) OFA udapl should probably be explicitly binding local cm_ids to port
> >zero.
> >
> >
> current implementation uses port zero on ep_c
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 13:57 -0400, Andrew Friedley wrote:
> Steve Wise wrote:
> >> Well I've tried OMPI on ofed-1.2 udapl today and it doesn't work. I'm
> >> debugging now.
> >>
> >
> > Here's part of the problem (from ompi/btl/udapl/btl_udapl.c):
> >
> > /* TODO - big bad evil hack! */
> >
Steve Wise wrote:
Well I've tried OMPI on ofed-1.2 udapl today and it doesn't work. I'm
debugging now.
Here's part of the problem (from ompi/btl/udapl/btl_udapl.c):
/* TODO - big bad evil hack! */
/* uDAPL doesn't ever seem to keep track of ports with addresses. This
becomes
> >> Chelsio's gonna pony up the resources to get this work done asap. Do
> >> you have any thoughts on how we can collaborate on this project? I'm
> >> familiar with mvapich, not ompi, so I need to go do some homework.
> >> But
> >> any pointers on the connection setup design for ompi would b
>
> Well I've tried OMPI on ofed-1.2 udapl today and it doesn't work. I'm
> debugging now.
>
Here's part of the problem (from ompi/btl/udapl/btl_udapl.c):
/* TODO - big bad evil hack! */
/* uDAPL doesn't ever seem to keep track of ports with addresses. This
becomes a problem w
In the "FYI" category...
There was discussion about the udpal BTL over OFED today on the
weekly developer teleconference (per my earlier post, a user is
reporting that it doesn't work). Andrew Friedley is going to work
with the Sun developers -- he thinks he might know where the problem
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:50 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> In the "FYI" category...
>
> There was discussion about the udpal BTL over OFED today on the
> weekly developer teleconference (per my earlier post, a user is
> reporting that it doesn't work). Andrew Friedley is going to work
> with
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 20:39 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On May 7, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
>
> > Also, there appears to be a DAPL BTL in OMPI. Is this BTL complete
> > and
> > enabled for the ofed-1.2 udapl library?
>
> Yes, it is complete and is well-tested in Solaris.
>
> It is
Hi,
What is the problem with supporting AlphaServers in
OpenMPI?
The alternatives, MPICH1 (very old) supports
AlphaServers; and MPICH2 (new) appears to work on
AlphaServers too (but setting up MPICH2 with the
mpd ring is just too complicated).
Hence, I would prefer OpenMPI instead.
Is there a w
11 matches
Mail list logo
