On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:43:03AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I think the main savings is that mellanox hardware works better when
> fewer qp's are open. I.e., it's a resource issue on the HCA, not
> necessarily a savings in posting buffers to the qp.
Interesting. I hear this justification
It easy to see the benefit of fewer qps (per node instead of per peer)
and less consumption of resources the better but I am curious about
the actual percentage of memory footprint decrease. I am thinking that
the largest portion of the footprint comes from the fragments.
BTW here is link to
