BTW,
I was guessing FTB is Fault Tolerant Backbone, but if not, can someone
tell me what it is ? If it is not the later, what I just wrote about it
makes no sense.
Rich
On 12/3/08 9:34 PM, "Richard Graham" wrote:
> The goal is to use the btl¹s outside of the context of MPI, which was what w
The goal is to use the btl¹s outside of the context of MPI, which was what
was in mind from the day the ompi work started over five years ago, but with
no other use at the time, things grew up intermingled no surprise at all.
What we are attempting to do is to untangle the existing dependencies,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Why not put the BTL's above the MPI layer? This would allow us to implement
an "mpi" BTL that uses MPI as a transport:
Would that allow striping messages over multiple MPI libraries ? And
wouldn't that make a MPI ABI really unnecessary ? :-)
--
Bogda
Why not put the BTL's above the MPI layer? This would allow us to
implement an "mpi" BTL that uses MPI as a transport:
shell$ mpirun --mca btl mpi,self ...
;-)
On Dec 3, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
I managed to execute the modex-less changes pretty much without
introducing
I managed to execute the modex-less changes pretty much without
introducing additional ORTE dependencies into the BTL's, though there
may be some additions as we look a the other BTLs that I didn't
address. So hopefully that won't contribute too much to the issue here.
At the moment, I don'
FWIW, I see lots of notifier calls being added to the BTLs (and
elsewhere throughout the OMPI code base) over time...
On Dec 3, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Tim Mattox wrote:
The BTLs might have added calls to the notifier framework in their
error paths.
The notifier framework is currently in the ORTE
The BTLs might have added calls to the notifier framework in their error paths.
The notifier framework is currently in the ORTE layer... not sure if we could
move it down to OPAL. Ralph, any thoughts on that?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Richard Graham wrote:
> George told me about what he i
There are a few changes relating to modex-less launch, but those will
mostly be committed by early next week.
On Dec 3, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Richard Graham wrote:
George told me about what he is doing, so no changes would be
committed
until George has his changes in.
Are there other changes
George told me about what he is doing, so no changes would be committed
until George has his changes in.
Are there other changes to the btl's that we should be aware of ?
Rich
On 12/3/08 11:47 AM, "George Bosilca" wrote:
> Terry,
>
> I'm involved [at some degree] in both efforts and I can co
Not at all.
On 12/3/08 11:48 AM, "Terry D. Dontje" wrote:
> Ahh, and then I woke up
>
> This might not be an issue (or a big one), but I have some code I am
> working on that replaces memcpy with an opal memcpy routine. Does your
> change below remove the ability of the BTLs to call opal r
Ahh, and then I woke up
This might not be an issue (or a big one), but I have some code I am
working on that replaces memcpy with an opal memcpy routine. Does your
change below remove the ability of the BTLs to call opal routines?
--td
Richard Graham wrote:
Now that 1.3 will be released,
Terry,
I'm involved [at some degree] in both efforts and I can confirm these
two efforts will not affect each other in any bad way.
george.
On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:42 , Terry Dontje wrote:
I don't have any *strong* objections. However, I know that Eugene
and George B have been working on
I don't have any *strong* objections. However, I know that Eugene and
George B have been working on some Fastpath code changes that we should
make sure neither project obliterates the other.
--td
Richard Graham wrote:
Now that 1.3 will be released, we would like to go ahead with the plan
to m
Not going to move these to the OPAL layer - this is part of phase 4 that
will need to be discussed.
Rich
On 12/3/08 10:03 AM, "Ralph Castain" wrote:
> Just curious: some of the BTL's have ORTE dependencies in them. How are you
> going to move them to the OPAL layer?
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2008, at
Just curious: some of the BTL's have ORTE dependencies in them. How
are you going to move them to the OPAL layer?
On Dec 3, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Richard Graham wrote:
Now that 1.3 will be released, we would like to go ahead with the
plan to move the btl’s out of the MPI layer. Greg Koenig who
Now that 1.3 will be released, we would like to go ahead with the plan to
move the btl¹s out of the MPI layer. Greg Koenig who is doing most of the
work has started a wiki page with details on the plans. Right now details
are sketchy, as Greg is digging through the code, and has only hand writte
16 matches
Mail list logo
