Thanks for all the helpful off-list replies.
Note that this mail was sent about 11 hours ago; it was sent when we thought
that some members of the list had caught a virus. Unfortunately, this mail,
too, was caught in the problem -- the IU admins apparently just released it
from the
Well it looks like the Sophos virus is making the rounds today. :-)
Thankfully, the Indiana U. virus scanner found and removed the virus before it
was delivered to our lists. I've moderated the two members who appear to have
sent the virus messages, so hopefully we won't get those messages
Hello, please apologize the spamming. the mailfilter somehow doesn't
like my mail. I have no clue what the problem could be... I've uploaded
the Mail as a simple textfile. Please have a look at it. Thanks.
http://www.sysckon.de/mail.txt
--
Paderborn Center for Parallel Computing - PC2
Sorry, but somehow the mailscanner doesn't like the sourcecode...
Changed now.
Hi again,
Maybe I should give more specific information with some code snippets...
Currently I added the definition ORTE_DAEMON_BTL_CTL_CMD
(orte_daemon_cmd_flag_t) 26 to odls_types.h to identify if I want to
Sorry, but the mailscanner somehow doesn't like the sourcecode...
Changed now.
Hi again,
Maybe I should give more specific information with some code snippets...
Currently I added
#define ORTE_DAEMON_BTL_CTL_CMD (orte_daemon_cmd_flag_t) 26
to odls_types.h to identify if I want to trigger the
Hi again,
Maybe I should give more specific information with some code snippets...
Currently I added
#define ORTE_DAEMON_BTL_CTL_CMD (orte_daemon_cmd_flag_t) 26
to odls_types.h to identify if I want to trigger the BTL pause.
In process_commands() of orted/orted_comm.c this flag is processed
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 08 Jan 2010 12:22:59 -0500, a écrit :
> On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> >> How do you guys want to handle params that are *sometimes* unused?
> >
> > I'd just mark them unused.
>
> Is it harmful to mark them unused when they're actually used?
No.
On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> How do you guys want to handle params that are *sometimes* unused?
>
> I'd just mark them unused.
Is it harmful to mark them unused when they're actually used?
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
How do you guys want to handle params that are *sometimes* unused?
For example, topology.c:1450 is:
-
int
hwloc_topology_set_fsroot(struct hwloc_topology *topology, const char
*fsroot_path)
{
/* cleanup existing backend */
hwloc_backend_exit(topology);
#ifdef HWLOC_LINUX_SYS
if
You've got this a tad wrong, but that's okay - let me try to clarify a couple
of things that may help.
First, you don't want to add this as a separate orted command. As you noted,
orte has no direct way to tell the OMPI layer to do anything. Instead, you want
to pass a message to the process
You may have noticed that some of the messages from this morning were marked as
a virus (prefixed with [PMX:VIRUS]). This was caused by the problem described
below by Rob. This affected the various mailing lists (including all the Open
MPI project lists) that were hosted by IU.
The admins at
Hi again,
Maybe I should give more specific information with some code snippets...
Currently I added
#define ORTE_DAEMON_BTL_CTL_CMD (orte_daemon_cmd_flag_t) 26
to odls_types.h to identify if I want to trigger the BTL pause.
In process_commands() of orted/orted_comm.c this flag is processed
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Eugene Loh wrote:
Could someone tell me how these settings are used in OMPI or give any
guidance on how they should or should not be used?
This is a very good question :-) As this whole e-mail, though it's hard
(in my opinion) to give it a Good (TM) answer.
This means
The original content of this message part has been replaced
by this text because it tested positive for the following
virus(es):
SOPHOS_SAVI_ERROR_OLD_VIRUS_DATA
The original message has been quarantined pending further
action by the mail administrator. For further information
about the
The original content of this message part has been replaced
by this text because it tested positive for the following
virus(es):
SOPHOS_SAVI_ERROR_OLD_VIRUS_DATA
The original message has been quarantined pending further
action by the mail administrator. For further information
about the
The original content of this message part has been replaced
by this text because it tested positive for the following
virus(es):
SOPHOS_SAVI_ERROR_OLD_VIRUS_DATA
The original message has been quarantined pending further
action by the mail administrator. For further information
about the
16 matches
Mail list logo
