Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1733
Start time: Wed Feb 17 21:01:02 EST 2010
End time: Wed Feb 17 21:03:10 EST 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
I'm trying to figure out what the limitation is for the number of
pending nonblocking operations as it does not seem to be specified
anywhere. I apologize if this is better suited to the user list, but
this seemed like information more likely to be available on the dev list.
As part of a toy
On Feb 17, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > The issue is that if the user has to specify -static to their linker,
> > they *also* have to specify --ompi:static, or Bad Things will happen.
> > Or, if they don't specify -static but *only* specify --ompi:static,
> > Bad Things will
Brian and I talked higher bandwidth to figure this out.
The issue is that if the user has to specify -static to their linker, they
*also* have to specify --ompi:static, or Bad Things will happen. Or, if they
don't specify -static but *only* specify --ompi:static, Bad Things will happen.
In
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Here's my proposal on how to change the wrapper compilers to understand the
> difference between static and dynamic linking:
>
> *** FIRST: give the wrapper the ability to link one library or all libraries
> - wrapper data text files grow a new
WHAT: Break ABI between 1.4 and 1.5 series.
WHY: To settle the ABI and .so versioning issues once and for all.
WHERE: Open MPI's .so versions and the opal_wrapper compiler.
WHEN: For 1.5[.0]. This is only meaningful if we do it for the *entire* v1.5
series.
TIMEOUT: Next Tuesday teleconf, 23
The problem seems to be that on SL, gfortran defaults to 32-bit binaries while
gcc defaults to 64-bit. If I set FFLAGS=-m64 then configure finishes. Of
course, I have no idea if a Fortran MPI program will actually *work*, but at
least OMPI builds. That's all that matters isn't it? :-).
Greg
On Tuesday 16 February 2010, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> We've only got 2 "critical" 1.5.0 bugs left, and I think that those will
> both be closed out pretty soon.
>
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/report/15
>
> Rainer and I both feel that a RC for 1.5.0 could be pretty soon.
>
> Does anyone
I'm checking this issue.
Pasha
Joshua Hursey wrote:
I just noticed that the nightly tarball of v1.4 failed to build in the OpenIB
BTL last night. The error was:
-
btl_openib_component.c: In function 'init_one_device':
btl_openib_component.c:2089: error:
I just noticed that the nightly tarball of v1.4 failed to build in the OpenIB
BTL last night. The error was:
-
btl_openib_component.c: In function 'init_one_device':
btl_openib_component.c:2089: error: 'mca_btl_openib_component_t' has no member
named 'default_recv_qps'
Hello Greg,
* Greg Watson wrote on Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:03:30PM CET:
> When I run configure under Snow Leopard (this is OMPI 1.3.4), I get the
> following:
>
> checking if C and Fortran 77 are link compatible... no
> **
> It
11 matches
Mail list logo