Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1rc1r2701
Start time: Thu Nov 4 21:03:21 EDT 2010
End time: Thu Nov 4 21:05:30 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
OK, thanks. Jeff.
I am not sure that this is related to my original question but I was actually
looking for a way to have ftt find my test examples with the following.
#==
# Test Run phase
Do we want deprecated attributes for the cpuset API then ? Looks like
we'd have to switch from #define to static inlines to do so.
Brice
Le 04/11/2010 16:51, sthib...@osl.iu.edu a écrit :
> Author: sthibaul
> Date: 2010-11-04 11:51:42 EDT (Thu, 04 Nov 2010)
> New Revision: 2696
> URL:
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 04 Nov 2010 16:03:29 +0100, a écrit :
> I notice that the v1.1 doxygen-generated HTML has a new header style:
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.1rc1/
> vs. http://www.open-mpi.org/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.0.2/
>
> Did *we* change that style, or am I using a
Jirka Hladky, le Thu 04 Nov 2010 16:59:35 +0100, a écrit :
> 3) Whenever I run lstopo using X output and I close lstopo window I will get
>
> $lstopo
> XIO: fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0"
> after 121 requests (121 known processed) with 0 events
We just created a new release series in hwloc (v1.1) and I wrote up on the wiki
all the things necessary to make that happen (e.g., changes on the web site,
build server, etc.). It's not exactly the same as it is for Open MPI, but it's
pretty close.
Since I haven't written up the same
I notice that the v1.1 doxygen-generated HTML has a new header style:
http://www.open-mpi.org/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.1rc1/
vs. http://www.open-mpi.org/projects/hwloc/doc/v1.0.2/
Did *we* change that style, or am I using a newer version of doxygen that
changed the style?
--
Jeff Squyres
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1rc1r2693
Start time: Thu Nov 4 08:46:58 EDT 2010
End time: Thu Nov 4 08:49:03 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Hi Brian,
I finally found some time to test your patch and it solves my problem.
Thanks a lot !
Sylvain
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
I found the issue - somehow, we let the priorities used in installdirs get lost
when we rewrote part of the configure system a couple months
