Thanks Jeff. Point release the tarball to 1.5.4 then for inclusion in Fedora,
Debian, and Ubuntu?
-Martin
On Jul 11, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Yowza. Our ARM contact has been testing from SVN, not the tarballs -- it
> looks like the ARM ASM was not included in the tarball
Yowza. Our ARM contact has been testing from SVN, not the tarballs -- it looks
like the ARM ASM was not included in the tarball. :-(
I just fixed that in the trunk:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/24875
I'll get that moved over to the v1.5 tree shortly.
On Jul 11, 2011, at
On Jul 11, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> When libevent was made its own component last fall, it appears that the
> function renames and visibility settings were lost. This is proving
> rather problematic for a project I'm trying to get running with the trunk
> which
Using the following configure line:
./configure CFLAGS=-Wa,-mimplicit-it=thumb --with-ft=cr --with-blcr=/usr
--with-blcr-libdir=/usr/lib --with-tm --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc/openmpi
--libdir=/usr/lib/openmpi/lib --includedir=/usr/lib/openm
Hi all -
When libevent was made its own component last fall, it appears that the
function renames and visibility settings were lost. This is proving
rather problematic for a project I'm trying to get running with the trunk
which uses libev (which provides a libevent compatibility layer). It
wor
Let me offer an alternative, if it would help. What if we:
1. remove all calls to opal_init/finalize from orte_init/finalize. ORTE will
only init and finalize it's own layer
2. rename opal_init to opal_init_frameworks, and ditto for opal_finalize. This
makes it clear what those functions actual
Shiqing notified me that when I upgraded the auto tools on the build server
yesterday, I forgot to include the proper version of flex -- so it used a
really old version (2.5.4 instead of 2.5.35) which generates _lex.c files that
don't compile on Windows.
I (think that I) have fixed the problem
(moved over from the users list; this is definitely a better fit for the devel
list...)
On Jul 11, 2011, at 4:17 AM, Ning Li wrote:
> I am willing to help test OpenMPI with the NAG compiler from time to time but
> not sure how. If you could give me specific instructions I am very happy to
> h
On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:28 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>> How about a compromise?
>
> Based on the english dictionary a compromise is an agreement or a settlement
> of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions. This is not a
> compromise. This is exactly what Ralph did plus name cha
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:37 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
> Trying to uplevel this a bit so I can figure out which of these paths makes
> sense to me. Is the only reason we want to convert the symmetry of init and
> finalize to being asymmetric is to support an abort case? Forgive me Ralph,
> I know
Trying to uplevel this a bit so I can figure out which of these paths
makes sense to me. Is the only reason we want to convert the symmetry
of init and finalize to being asymmetric is to support an abort case?
Forgive me Ralph, I know you had posted this in one of the emails but I
wanted to
On Jul 9, 2011, at 13:43 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Leaving out many details, I think the arguments can be summarized as:
>
> 1. Ralph's argument is that per convention of our other 2 layers,
> "_finalize" should unconditionally finalize the layer. Just do it.
> It's also weird that opal_finali
12 matches
Mail list logo
