Oh, I missed a big one:
7) opal/util/path.c has "#elif defined(linux)" but XLC does not define this.
This is breaking test/util/opal_pth_nfs.c
See http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10268.php
-Paul
On 1/30/2012 4:25 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
In retesting I see that the
In retesting I see that the following items I reported in 1.4.5rc2 or
rc1 have NOT been resolved in rc3.
This list is meant to be complete, even for issues that I reported so
recently that no fix is expected and those that probably won't be fixed
at all.
0) README for Solaris Studio compilers
On 1/30/12 3:53 PM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote:
>On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure this is any better than saying "--mca pml cm" versus "--mca
>> pml ob1", other than there's at least some rational names involved.
>> However, it does seem awful
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Actually, the MXM component is an MTL, not a PML, so Jeff's option
> wouldn't work.
Oh, right. Duh.
> I'm not sure this is any better than saying "--mca pml cm" versus "--mca
> pml ob1", other than there's at least some rational names
Actually, the MXM component is an MTL, not a PML, so Jeff's option
wouldn't work.
I'm not sure this is any better than saying "--mca pml cm" versus "--mca
pml ob1", other than there's at least some rational names involved.
However, it does seem awful silly to thread the enabled through the
Mellanox --
Isn't this redundant with the "pml" MCA parameter? For example, you can
disable MXM via:
mpirun --mca pml ^mxm ...
(I said the same thing on #2988, the CMR to move this commit to v1.5.5)
On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:14 AM, mi...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
> Author: miked
> Date:
On 1/29/2012 7:40 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
I can additionally report success w/ ILP32 builds with both SS12.2 and
12.3 compilers on x86-64 and sun4v systems running Solaris and
x86-64/Linux:
solaris-10 Generic_137111-07/sun4v (*FLAGS="-m32 -xarch=sparc" for
v8plus ABI)
solaris-11
On 1/29/2012 9:28 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
[snip]
I also had to disable the opal_path_nfs test again on the POWER6
machine, even w/ the linux->__linux__ change.
I will report on that when/if I can determine the cause.
-Paul
Following up on the opal_path_nfs test failures I reported
Hello Aurelien.
2012/1/27 Aurélien Bouteiller
> Hugo,
>
> It seems you want to implement some sort of remote pessimistic logging -a
> la MPICH-V1- ?
> MPICH-V: Toward a Scalable Fault Tolerant MPI for Volatile Nodes -- George
> Bosilca, Aurélien Bouteiller, Franck
While I previously reported success with xlc-11.1 on Linux for both
ppc32 and ppc64 ABIs, I find that all is not perfect with earlier compilers.
SUMMARY:
xlc-9.0 / xlf-11.1
PASS on ILP32 ABI
FAIL on LP64 ABI (details below)
xlc-8.0 / xlf-10.1
PASS on ILP32 ABI
PASS
10 matches
Mail list logo