Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc3 released

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Oh, I missed a big one: 7) opal/util/path.c has "#elif defined(linux)" but XLC does not define this. This is breaking test/util/opal_pth_nfs.c See http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/01/10268.php -Paul On 1/30/2012 4:25 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: In retesting I see that the

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc3 released

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
In retesting I see that the following items I reported in 1.4.5rc2 or rc1 have NOT been resolved in rc3. This list is meant to be complete, even for issues that I reported so recently that no fix is expected and those that probably won't be fixed at all. 0) README for Solaris Studio compilers

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r25813

2012-01-30 Thread Barrett, Brian W
On 1/30/12 3:53 PM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote: >On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > >> I'm not sure this is any better than saying "--mca pml cm" versus "--mca >> pml ob1", other than there's at least some rational names involved. >> However, it does seem awful

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r25813

2012-01-30 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > Actually, the MXM component is an MTL, not a PML, so Jeff's option > wouldn't work. Oh, right. Duh. > I'm not sure this is any better than saying "--mca pml cm" versus "--mca > pml ob1", other than there's at least some rational names

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Re: [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r25813

2012-01-30 Thread Barrett, Brian W
Actually, the MXM component is an MTL, not a PML, so Jeff's option wouldn't work. I'm not sure this is any better than saying "--mca pml cm" versus "--mca pml ob1", other than there's at least some rational names involved. However, it does seem awful silly to thread the enabled through the

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r25813

2012-01-30 Thread Jeff Squyres
Mellanox -- Isn't this redundant with the "pml" MCA parameter? For example, you can disable MXM via: mpirun --mca pml ^mxm ... (I said the same thing on #2988, the CMR to move this commit to v1.5.5) On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:14 AM, mi...@osl.iu.edu wrote: > Author: miked > Date:

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 more Solaris Studio compiler results

2012-01-30 Thread TERRY DONTJE
On 1/29/2012 7:40 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote: I can additionally report success w/ ILP32 builds with both SS12.2 and 12.3 compilers on x86-64 and sun4v systems running Solaris and x86-64/Linux: solaris-10 Generic_137111-07/sun4v (*FLAGS="-m32 -xarch=sparc" for v8plus ABI) solaris-11

[OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 opal_path_nfs failure follow-up

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
On 1/29/2012 9:28 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: [snip] I also had to disable the opal_path_nfs test again on the POWER6 machine, even w/ the linux->__linux__ change. I will report on that when/if I can determine the cause. -Paul Following up on the opal_path_nfs test failures I reported

Re: [OMPI devel] Pessimist Event Logger

2012-01-30 Thread Hugo Daniel Meyer
Hello Aurelien. 2012/1/27 Aurélien Bouteiller > Hugo, > > It seems you want to implement some sort of remote pessimistic logging -a > la MPICH-V1- ? > MPICH-V: Toward a Scalable Fault Tolerant MPI for Volatile Nodes -- George > Bosilca, Aurélien Bouteiller, Franck

[OMPI devel] 1.4.5rc2 linux/ppc/xlc-{7,8,9} [3 PASS, 3 FAIL]

2012-01-30 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
While I previously reported success with xlc-11.1 on Linux for both ppc32 and ppc64 ABIs, I find that all is not perfect with earlier compilers. SUMMARY: xlc-9.0 / xlf-11.1 PASS on ILP32 ABI FAIL on LP64 ABI (details below) xlc-8.0 / xlf-10.1 PASS on ILP32 ABI PASS