Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2

This is consistent with my findings w/ XLC (mostly on BG/L and BG/P front end nodes). None of the 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 or 11.1 versions of XLC I tested could generate correct atomics. They either failed at build time, or failed the tests in test/asm/. -Paul On 2/23/2012 8:17 PM, Christopher Samuel

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/02/12 15:12, Christopher Samuel wrote: > I suspect this is irrelevant, but I got a build failure trying to > compile it on our BG/P front end node (login node) with the IBM XL > compilers. Oops, forgot how I built it.. export

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/02/12 00:17, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: > Please test! I suspect this is irrelevant, but I got a build failure trying to compile it on our BG/P front end node (login node) with the IBM XL compilers. make[5]: Entering directory

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

OpenPBS, PBS Pro, and Torque are all identical from our perspective - the launcher code is the same. On Feb 23, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 23/02/12 09:44, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: > >> - PBS Pro, Open PBS, Torque > >

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23/02/12 09:44, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: > - PBS Pro, Open PBS, Torque Does anyone actually use OpenPBS any more these days? It was abandoned almost 11 years ago now from what I see (2.3.16 was June 2001).

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.3.3a1r4340)

Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.3.3a1r4340 Start time: Thu Feb 23 21:07:00 EST 2012 End time: Thu Feb 23 21:09:57 EST 2012 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.4.1rc2r4342)

Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.4.1rc2r4342 Start time: Thu Feb 23 21:04:12 EST 2012 End time: Thu Feb 23 21:07:00 EST 2012 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.5a1r4341)

Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.5a1r4341 Start time: Thu Feb 23 21:01:01 EST 2012 End time: Thu Feb 23 21:04:12 EST 2012 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

I'm not yet using the Mac OS X LLVM compilers. I have been under the impression that LLVM compilers are not GNU compilers. However, given the names llvm-gcc-x.x, I guess they are some sort of hybrid. (gcc front end, LLVM backend?) I agree with Jeff's point about not getting too

Re: [hwloc-devel] ship valgrind suppressions?

Sure, let's ship it in the tarball. On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Hello, > > "make check" doesn't report any single memory leak under valgrind > anymore in trunk... except those from external libs such as libpci and > libxml. I created the attached suppressions file to hide

[hwloc-devel] ship valgrind suppressions?

Hello, "make check" doesn't report any single memory leak under valgrind anymore in trunk... except those from external libs such as libpci and libxml. I created the attached suppressions file to hide them when valgrind'ing hwloc programs. Just pass --suppressions=hwloc.supp to valgrind. For the

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

Sorry folks. That was intended just for Jeff's eyes, but my fingers moved faster than my brain. No offense was intended. -Paul On 2/23/2012 10:01 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I think the VT folks get blamed often enough for build issues w/o attributing one more problem to them. On

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

I think the VT folks get blamed often enough for build issues w/o attributing one more problem to them. On 2/23/2012 9:47 AM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: Cool; thanks for setting this straight. -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group HPC

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

Cool; thanks for setting this straight. Doesn't change the outcome, though -- I updated the README (i.e., something like "update your Solaris Studio install!"). We have similar statements about other broken/buggy compilers. On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: > Just a

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

Just a Minor correction. Instead of: - The C++ part of the build (VT) is deep within the OMPI build; it works fine with the C compiler all the way up until that point The correct facts are: - The C++ part of the VT build requires CXXFLAGS=-library=stlport4 when using the SS12 compilers. -

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

Terry and I talked about this on the phone. Supporting facts (some of these are repeated from Paul's prior posts): - This happens with the C++ SS 12.2 compiler on supported Linux platforms - The C++ part of the build (VT) is deep within the OMPI build; it works fine with the C compiler all the

[OMPI devel] 1.5.5rc2

We finally have 1.5.5rc2: http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.5/ Given the amount of testing we've had, this rc might actually be pretty close. Lots and lots of changes since rc1; I'm not even going to bother to list them all. Please test! -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

I don't think I want to get specific about the gcc versions on any platform, unless we know that they *don't* work. There's too many versions and variants of gcc out there to have an inclusive list -- I'd rather have an *exclusive* list. On Feb 23, 2012, at 3:39 AM, Paul Hargrove wrote: >

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

On Feb 23, 2012, at 6:05 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote: > I actually think the systems tested line for Solaris should read: > - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 32 and 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64), with > Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3 Done. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal

Re: [OMPI devel] v1.5 build failure w/ Solaris Studio 12.2 on Linux

On 2/22/2012 8:53 PM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote: Terry / Eugene -- Can you comment? Sorry I cannot. --td On Feb 22, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: I think I have the beginning of a fix for this issue. I had not even noticed earlier that the error in event.h is from the C++

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

I actually think the systems tested line for Solaris should read: - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 32 and 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64), with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3 --td On 2/22/2012 8:55 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: Folks at Oracle should decide, but I suspect "Solaris 10" should be

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.5 supported systems

And here is the 10.7 machine as promised: ProductName: Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.7.3 BuildVersion: 11D50b lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Oct 27 14:01 /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 -Paul On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: > I can get exact info from my