Re: [OMPI devel] "Open MPI"-based MPI library used by K computer

2013-01-10 Thread Kawashima, Takahiro
Hi, Sorry for not replying sooner. I'm taliking with the authors (they are not in this list) and will request linking the PDF soon if they allowed. Takahiro Kawashima, MPI development team, Fujitsu > Our policy so far was that adding a paper to the list of publication on the > Open MPI website

Re: [OMPI devel] Build open MPI

2013-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Check the HACKING file in the top-level directory if you need some assistance on how to upgrade your Autoconf/Automake/Libtool. On Jan 9, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > I'm pretty sure we are at autoconf 2.69 now. You might want to upgrade it, > and ensure

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI users] Backward Compatibility of MPI Java Binding

2013-01-10 Thread Yoshiki SATO
> Yes -- IIRC, the Java interface isn't really dependent upon anything specific > in the back-end C implementation of Open MPI. So I'm guessing/assuming that > if you can build it, it should work against the 1.6 OMPI C engine just fine. Sounds good :-) I'm going to try to build it anyway, and

Re: [hwloc-devel] [RFC] deprecating multiple load() support

2013-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
+1 This sounds fine to me. On Jan 3, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Hello, > > hwloc users are supposed to configure/build topologies like this: > hwloc_topology_init() > /* all configuration calls */ > hwloc_topology_set_xml() > hwloc_topology_set_flags()

Re: [OMPI devel] use of stat() during malloc initialization

2013-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Committed in https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/27785, and I filed CMRs to get this fix in 1.6.4 and 1.7. On Jan 10, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Phil Carns wrote: > Thanks Jeff. I tested the patch just now using Open MPI SVN trunk revision > 27784. I was able to

Re: [OMPI devel] use of stat() during malloc initialization

2013-01-10 Thread Phil Carns
Thanks Jeff. I tested the patch just now using Open MPI SVN trunk revision 27784. I was able to instrument an application without any trouble at all, and the patch looks great. I definitely understand the memory registration cache pain. I've dabbled in network abstractions for file systems

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI users] Backward Compatibility of MPI Java Binding

2013-01-10 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Jan 9, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Yoshiki SATO wrote: > The 1.7's Java implementation under ompi/mpi/java seem to be able to build up > independently. Do you think we can build just them and run it (via > prunjava?) with our custom OpenMPI build based on 1.6? Yes --

Re: [OMPI devel] "Open MPI"-based MPI library used by K computer

2013-01-10 Thread George Bosilca
Our policy so far was that adding a paper to the list of publication on the Open MPI website was a discretionary action at the authors' request. I don't see any compelling reason to change. Moreover, Fujitsu being a contributor of the Open MPI community, there is no obstacle of adding a link to