Re: [OMPI devel] 'install-sh' in SVN

Shirley. :-) On Jun 7, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Thomas Naughton wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like an auto-generated 'install-sh' was accidentally added to SVN > under libevent in OPAL: > >ompi-trunk/opal/mca/event/libevent2021/libevent/install-sh > > Ok, to remove it? > --tjn

[OMPI devel] 'install-sh' in SVN

Hi, It looks like an auto-generated 'install-sh' was accidentally added to SVN under libevent in OPAL: ompi-trunk/opal/mca/event/libevent2021/libevent/install-sh Ok, to remove it? --tjn _ Thomas Naughton

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Add static initializer for opal_mutex_t

Perhaps I was wrong -- I thought we had no static initializer because there was no static initializer for mutexes in windows. On Jun 7, 2013, at 9:28 AM, George Bosilca wrote: > Im curious to know why Windows support is to be blamed for the lack of such >

[OMPI devel] RFC: Add static initializer for opal_mutex_t

What: Add a static initializer for opal_mutex_t for both posix and solaris threads. Why: Enables the use of opal locks that don't have to be OBJ_CONSTRUCT'ed. When: This is a trivial addition but I would like some review/testing of the code (I don't have solaris). Setting timeout to Tuesday,

Re: [OMPI devel] Rest of OMPI meeting notes up

Yes - thanks! One note about the threading changes. We will need to sequence those a bit. IIRC, the current OOB isn't happy when you turn on opal thread support and can "wedge" itself. I also suspect we'll want the MPI_Waitall fix before we enable thread multiple by default. On Jun 7, 2013,