On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:31 PM, "Prindeville, Philip"
wrote:
> I think I understand.
>
> I’ll pull a copy of trunk and dig around in there.
>
> Is there a reason that the code can’t be gated by conditional compilation
> flags or detect the environment at run-time?
We already have conditional compilation there at configure time (see
ompi/mca/btl/sctp/configure.m4) so it won't built unless requested.
Likewise, you can use the MCA params to select to use it or not (-mca btl
sctp,sm,self).
I'm not aware of any sctp-specific tests. However, there are lots of
I think I understand.
I'll pull a copy of trunk and dig around in there.
Is there a reason that the code can't be gated by conditional compilation flags
or detect the environment at run-time?
Is there anything in the way of a set of verification tests? And what's the
provenance of the SCTP
Sorry for delay - we just realized we hadn't addressed this yet.
Plan is to still start at 9am as planned. Hope that is okay.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> No changes yet, Josh - I'm the only one here :-(
>
> We can revisit the time when the
* Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquy...@cisco.com) [20131211 21:01]:
> Can you send the opal_config.h file from your build tree?
>
> This will help us look into what's going on.
Attached.
Note that it doesn't seem to be dependent on the build architecture as it
fails at the same spot for all Archs
No changes yet, Josh - I'm the only one here :-(
We can revisit the time when the others arrive later today
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> I think we had C/R slated for Friday morning - is that still correct?
>
> I have a meeting at 10 that just
I think we had C/R slated for Friday morning - is that still correct?
I have a meeting at 10 that just popped up, so I can only attend for an
hour if we start at 9. I just wanted to confirm that that was the current
plan or if had been modified.
-- Josh
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Jeff
Be aware that we removed SCTP from the 1.7 release series because of its
unknown state of repair - I don't believe anyone has tested it in quite
some time, and nobody has been maintaining it so far as we know. Not saying
it won't work - just saying that I don't think we know :-/
On Wed, Dec 11,
For those of you here in Chicago and not coming to the MPI Forum meeting this
morning, feel free to head over to the Cisco facility any time after 8am US
Central time. Here's the wiki page with the address:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/wiki/Dec13Meeting
We're in the conference room