Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.7.2-26-gaaaf369
Start time: Wed Apr 23 21:03:25 EDT 2014
End time: Wed Apr 23 21:05:43 EDT 2014
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc dev-156-g7489287
Start time: Wed Apr 23 21:01:01 EDT 2014
End time: Wed Apr 23 21:03:24 EDT 2014
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> This code is only built on Linux
Yes, of course!
I neglected to look at the name of the file in question.
No guard is needed for even my oldest Linux systems.
-Paul
--
Paul H. Hargrove
Rupert,
You are right, the code of any non-blocking reduce is not built with
user-level op in mind. However, I'm not sure about your patch. One
reason is that ompi_3buff is doing target = source1 op source2 while
ompi_2buf is doing target op= source (notice the op=)
Thus you can't replace
This code is only built on Linux so I am not sure we're more portable than OMPI
here. The oldest Linux we've tested bwloc on is likely your machines ;)
Brice
On 24 avril 2014 00:48:46 UTC+02:00, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>Since I suspect hwloc may run on *more* platforms than
Currently, POSIX defines exactly one flag accessed via F_GETFD/F_SETFD and
that is FD_CLOEXEC.
However, it does not prohibit a conforming implementation from defining
additional bits.
So, a portable program should assume other bits may be set and try to
preserve them.
Quoting from section 3.14
Any objections to this patch? In OMPI, we're seeing this fd leak into child
processes.
diff --git a/src/topology-linux.c b/src/topology-linux.c
index e934d4c..8c5fba1 100644
--- a/src/topology-linux.c
+++ b/src/topology-linux.c
@@ -4601,6 +4601,13 @@ hwloc_linux_component_instantiate(struct
As maintainer of a different communications library over Verbs I'd like to
ask:
Where can one find information on the new APIs and their use?
-Paul
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> Yes, we plan to fix support for XRC due to the changes in 3.12. It will
Hello devel list
I've been trying to use a non-blocking MPI_Iallreduce in a CFD application I'm
working on, but it kept segfaulting on me. I have reduced it to a simple test
case - see the gist here for the full code
https://gist.github.com/rupertnash/1182
build and run with:
Yes, we plan to fix support for XRC due to the changes in 3.12. It will
probably not happen before 1.8.2 though.
-Nathan
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 02:58:49PM +0200, Piotr Lesnicki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In OFED-3.12 the API for XRC has changed. I did not find
> corresponding changes in Open MPI: for
Hi,
In OFED-3.12 the API for XRC has changed. I did not find
corresponding changes in Open MPI: for example the function
'ibv_create_xrc_rcv_qp()' queried in openmpi configure script no
longer exists in ofed-3.12-rc1.
Are there any plans to support the new XRC API ?
--
Piotr
my bad :-(
this has just been fixed
Gilles
On 2014/04/23 14:55, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> The ompi_datatype_flatten.c file appears to be missing. Let me know once
> it is committed and I will take a look. I will see if I can write the
> RMA code using it over the next week or so.
>
The ompi_datatype_flatten.c file appears to be missing. Let me know once
it is committed and I will take a look. I will see if I can write the
RMA code using it over the next week or so.
-Nathan
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 02:43:12PM +0900, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> i uploaded this
George,
i am sorry i cannot see how flatten datatype can be helpful here :-(
in this example, the master must broadcast a long vector. this datatype
is contiguous
so the flatten'ed datatype *is* the type provided by the MPI application.
how would pipelining happen in this case (e.g. who has to
Nathan,
i uploaded this part to github :
https://github.com/ggouaillardet/ompi-svn-mirror/tree/flatten-datatype
you really need to check the last commit :
https://github.com/ggouaillardet/ompi-svn-mirror/commit/a8d014c6f144fa5732bdd25f8b6b05b07ea8
please consider this as experimental and
Both these issues are fixed in the trunk and are scheduled for the
1.8. The commit you need to check is r28584 and the corresponding
ticket is
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4554
George.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> It seems the
16 matches
Mail list logo