On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:52 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> I don't have experience with GerritHub, but Bitbucket supports this
> feature (permissions on branch names/globs) and we use it in PETSc.
Thanks for the info. Paul Hargrove said pretty much the same thing to me,
off-list.
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.9.1-11-g6ec83e5
Start time: Tue Sep 23 21:02:56 EDT 2014
End time: Tue Sep 23 21:04:19 EDT 2014
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc dev-235-g415b593
Start time: Tue Sep 23 21:01:02 EDT 2014
End time: Tue Sep 23 21:02:46 EDT 2014
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> GerritHub claims to allow us to effectively have ACLs on branches.
> I.e., everyone could commit on master, but only release managers can
> commit on release branches. This would be nice, and would allow us to
> avoid having the 2 repos,
True - but we intend to collect the inventory as root anyway. :-)
On Sep 23, 2014, at 1:50 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> On 24/09/14 00:57, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
>> Memory info is available from lshw, though they are a GPL code:
>
> FWIW on this laptop (Intel
On 24/09/14 00:57, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Memory info is available from lshw, though they are a GPL code:
FWIW on this laptop (Intel Haswell) lshw only report DIMM info when run
as root, which I suspect would point them to accessing DMI information
via /dev/mem.
Using strace supports this:
At just about at the last minute, a new contender showed up: GerritHub.io.
GerritHub claims to allow us to effectively have ACLs on branches. I.e.,
everyone could commit on master, but only release managers can commit on
release branches. This would be nice, and would allow us to avoid having
Le 23/09/2014 21:06, Pedaballe, Vineet a écrit :
> 4a. Network Adapters (Ethernet)
> a. Model
> b. Speed
Both supported and currently negociated link speed?
On Linux, we'll have to use the ethtool interface.
> c. Serial Number (if applicable)
> d. MAC address
> 4b.
Sorry for the delay in response, somehow I missed this.
Those were SVN IDs. I have created a github id (vvenkatesan)
vvenkates is the currently active SVN ID. So
vvenkates -> vvenkatesan
Thanks
Vish
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:58 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
wrote:
On Sep
Thank you Ralph and Jeff.
This was the list I was hoping to read through hwloc.
3. Memory
a. Total memory
b. Total DIMMS
c. Individual DIMM's:
(i) Serial numbers
(ii) Vendor Name
(iii) Model
(iv) Memory
REMINDER: The conversion of Open MPI's Subversion repository and Trac tickets
will be happening tomorrow, Wednesday, September 24, 2014.
SVN and Trac will be going read-only at 8am US Eastern tomorrow, and the
conversion process will begin. I anticipate it taking all day.
I'll send an "all
Le 23/09/2014 16:46, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> Le 23/09/2014 16:38, Guy Streeter a écrit :
>> I know that udev gathers this information:
>>
>> # ll /sys/block/sda/bdi
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Sep 23 09:33 /sys/block/sda/bdi ->
>> ../../../../../../../../virtual/bdi/8:0
>> # grep SERIAL
Memory info is available from lshw, though they are a GPL code:
*-bank:0
description: DIMM Synchronous 1333 MHz (0.8 ns)
product: M393B1K70DH0-YH9
vendor: 0x80CE
physical id: 0
serial: 0x85B5FED3
slot: DIMM_A1
size: 8GiB
Le 23/09/2014 16:38, Guy Streeter a écrit :
> I know that udev gathers this information:
>
> # ll /sys/block/sda/bdi
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Sep 23 09:33 /sys/block/sda/bdi ->
> ../../../../../../../../virtual/bdi/8:0
> # grep SERIAL '/run/udev/data/b8:0'
>
Rolf -- please add this to the agenda for today.
On Sep 23, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> ofacm needs to be updated to remove xoob and oob modules as those cannot be
> used from the opal layer
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
ofacm needs to be updated to remove xoob and oob modules as those cannot be
used from the opal layer
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> From SVN trunk HEAD (r32772):
>
> -
> mca/btl/ugni/btl_ugni_component.c
> 20:#include
Thanks! I won't have time to work on it this week, but appreciate your effort.
Also, thanks for clarifying the race condition vis 1.8 - I agree it is not a
blocker for that release.
Ralph
On Sep 22, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> Ralph,
>
>
On Sep 22, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 6:55 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>>> HWLOC already provides similar info for processors and mother boards, so it
>>> seemed a natural extension of current capabilities
18 matches
Mail list logo