Errr... I got the patch slightly wrong. The one added line should include the
".$HWLOC_RELEASE_VERSION" at the end. You get the idea...
On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> We just changed the version numbering scheme over in OMPI to always be
>
We just changed the version numbering scheme over in OMPI to always be "a.b.c",
even if c==0. Do we want the same thing in hwloc?
Right now, hwloc uses the old OMPI versioning scheme -- it's "a.b.c", except
when c==0, and then the version is "a.b".
It's a pretty simple change:
diff --git
I should have been clearer. This changes how the topo components are
expected to work. With this change they now MUST provide the c_topo to
the communicator before coll_select. The change is good but may be
unexpected for any vendor topo components out there (which I doubt
there are any).
-Nathan
I see no change in the topo interface in any of the patches attached to this
thread. Is there any other patch related to this discussion?
George.
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 14:52, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
>> On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
>>
On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> oops, i missed graph and dist graph :-(
>
> the attached patch fixes this
> /* it was straightforward for graph and a bit more challenging for dist
> graph */
>
> i am fine for Nathan's patch for v1.8
> /*
oops, i missed graph and dist graph :-(
the attached patch fixes this
/* it was straightforward for graph and a bit more challenging for dist
graph */
i am fine for Nathan's patch for v1.8
/* v1.8 and trunk have already a different way to handle a memory leak */
/* the attached patch is vs v1.8
Thanks Ralph !
it did fix the problem
Cheers,
Gilles
On 2014/10/01 3:04, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I fixed this in r32818 - the components shouldn't be passing back success if
> the requested info isn't found. Hope that fixes the problem.
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
>