[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc git 1.10.1-14-gffd4fa8)

2015-03-11 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.10.1-14-gffd4fa8 Start time: Wed Mar 11 21:03:13 EDT 2015 End time: Wed Mar 11 21:04:46 EDT 2015 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc git dev-459-g4208a31)

2015-03-11 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc dev-459-g4208a31 Start time: Wed Mar 11 21:01:02 EDT 2015 End time: Wed Mar 11 21:02:59 EDT 2015 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [OMPI devel] BML changes

2015-03-11 Thread Atchley, Scott
We have some new Power8 nodes with dual-port FDR HCAs. I have not tested same-node Verbs throughput. Using Linux’s Cross Memory Attach (CMA), I can get 30 GB/s for 2 MB messages between two cores and then it drops off to ~12 GB/s. The PCIe Gen3 x16 slots should max at ~15 GB/s. I agree that

Re: [OMPI devel] BML changes

2015-03-11 Thread Nathan Hjelm
In that case we should find a way to eliminate this behavior. I will take a look later this week and see if there is a workable solution. -Nathan On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:41:00AM -0600, Howard Pritchard wrote: >My experience with DMA engines located on the other side of a PCI-e 16x >

Re: [OMPI devel] BML changes

2015-03-11 Thread Howard Pritchard
My experience with DMA engines located on the other side of a PCI-e 16x gen3 bus from the cpus is that for a couple of ranks doing large transfers between each other on a node, using the DMA engine looks good. But once there are multiple ranks exchanging data (like up to 32 ranks on a dual socket

Re: [OMPI devel] BML changes

2015-03-11 Thread Nathan Hjelm
Definitely a side-effect though it could be beneficial in some cases as the RDMA engine in the HCA may be faster than using memcpy (larger than a certain size). I don't know how to best fix this as I need all RDMA capable BTLs to listed for RMA. I though about adding another list to track BTLs

Re: [OMPI devel] Master warning on oob:ud w/ PGI

2015-03-11 Thread Nathan Hjelm
Fixed. -Nathan On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:57:22PM -0800, Paul Hargrove wrote: >The warning below comes from pgi-14.7 on the latest master tarball (output >from "make V=1"). >-Paul >libtool: compile: pgcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > >