Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.11.0-21-g69de235
Start time: Thu Aug 20 21:05:42 EDT 2015
End time: Thu Aug 20 21:07:12 EDT 2015
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot git tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.10.1-53-gabade8e
Start time: Thu Aug 20 21:04:19 EDT 2015
End time: Thu Aug 20 21:05:42 EDT 2015
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
> > And therefore it didn't generate libmpi_mpifh_sizeof.a (gfortran will generate an effectively "empty" libmpi_mpifh_sizeof.a). Hence, a
> subsequent link that depended on that library failed.
>
> Paul: can
$#%@%@#$%
WTF?
Yes. Somehow I stomped on my $HOME/.gitconfig. :-(
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Dave Goodell (dgoodell)
> wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 3:03 PM, git...@crest.iu.edu wrote:
>
>> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
On Aug 20, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
>> I'll bet that OMPI determined that your Fortran compiler didn't support
>> enough Fortran mojo to properly support MPI_SIZEOF. So it generated an
>> empty .f90 file. And therefore it
>
> And therefore it
On Aug 20, 2015, at 3:03 PM, git...@crest.iu.edu wrote:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
> generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
> the project "open-mpi/ompi".
>
> The branch, master has been updated
> via
On Aug 20, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
> Ah, I see the issue:
>
> -
> GENERATE psizeof_f.f90
> FC psizeof_f.lo
> WARNING: Source file "psizeof_f.f90" contains no Fortran statements.
>
> f90comp: 29 SOURCE LINES
> f90comp: 0 ERRORS, 1
Ah, I see the issue:
-
GENERATE psizeof_f.f90
FC psizeof_f.lo
WARNING: Source file "psizeof_f.f90" contains no Fortran statements.
f90comp: 29 SOURCE LINES
f90comp: 0 ERRORS, 1 WARNINGS, 0 OTHER MESSAGES, 0 ANSI
-
As you can see, (p)sizeof_f.f90 is a generated file. I'll bet
Jeff,
My testing scripts always pass V=1 to each make command, but as you can see
in my report that didn't give full command lines.
It is worth noting that on this system "make" is not Gnu-Make.
I am venturing a guess that this is why V=1 is not producing the expected
output.
That might be the
No problem. I should have caught it in my post-cherry-pick tests. I
forgot to test with -m32.
-Nathan
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:37:17AM -0700, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>Excellent. Sorry I let this escape into the 1.8.8 release.
>-Paul
>On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Squyres
Excellent. Sorry I let this escape into the 1.8.8 release.
-Paul
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <
jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> (the fix has been merged in to v1.8 and v1.10 branches)
>
> > On Aug 20, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> >
> >
> >
OK, I'll see what I can do. I have a conf call in an hour.
So I'll if I don't have your requested output before that, it will be much
later today.
-Paul
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <
jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Paul --
>
> Can you give me more info on this?
>
>
Paul --
Can you give me more info on this?
Can you "make clean all V=1" in the ompi/mpi/fortran/mpif-h directory and send
me the output?
Additionally, can you send the output of "ls -l ompi/mpi/fortran/mpif-h/.libs"
after the make?
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 11:40 PM, Paul Hargrove
Paul sent me some additional info off-list, and I fixed the issue.
PR's filed for v1.10 and v2.x.
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Todd Kordenbrock wrote:
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> The linker
(the fix has been merged in to v1.8 and v1.10 branches)
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>
>
> I see the problem. Both Ralph and I missed an error in the
> cherry-pick. For add_32 in the ia32 atomics we were checking for
> OPAL_GCC_INLINE_ASSEMBLY instead of
I see the problem. Both Ralph and I missed an error in the
cherry-pick. For add_32 in the ia32 atomics we were checking for
OPAL_GCC_INLINE_ASSEMBLY instead of OMPI_GCC_INLINE_ASSEMBLY.
-Nathan
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:01:35PM +, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Paul --
>
> I see that
16 matches
Mail list logo