Successful builds: ['v1.11']
Skipped builds: []
Failed builds: ['master']
=== Build output ===
Branches: ['v1.11', 'master']
Starting build for v1.11
Found new revision 646c39e
v1.11 build of revision 646c39e completed successfully
Starting build for master
Found new revision 4aacd8b
The gap between these two versions is quite huge. I will first try to debug a
bit more in 1.10.
Regards,
Shiqing
-Original Message-
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of
r...@open-mpi.org
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:02 PM
To: OpenMPI Devel
Subject: Re:
I’m not familiar with the openib code, but this looks to me like it may be
caused by a change in the openib code itself. Have you looked to see what the
diff might be between the two versions?
> On Apr 21, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Shiqing Fan wrote:
>
> I've tried this out,
I've tried this out, and got the same problem as I sent before.
With the same configuration and command line, 1.6.5 works for me, 1.10 series
seem not.
Could it also be IB configuration issue? (ib_write/read_bw/lat work fine across
the two nodes)
Error output below:
On Apr 19, 2017, at 10:12 PM, Kevin Buckley
wrote:
>
> This observation may not belong here, but as there are some eyes on this
> issue, I might as well raise it here, as I came across it in the wake of going
> with Choice 2
>
> If one wishes to take a
Thanks Gilles, I will try it out today and let you know if it's working for me
or not.
Regards,
Shiqing
-Original Message-
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Gilles
Gouaillardet
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 9:41 AM
To: devel@lists.open-mpi.org
Subject:
The last message was from my test output, it makes no sense anyway.
It looks like some QP/CQ initialization problem, but it’s hard to find the
exact place at momemnt. I will try Gilles’ patch and see if it’s working for me.
PS: Actually I made the patch from 1.10 series when OOB was removed.
Folks,
fwiw, i made https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/3393 and it works for
me on a mlx4 cluster (Mellanox QDR)
Cheers,
Gilles
On 4/21/2017 1:31 AM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
I’m not seeing any problem inside the OOB - the problem appears to be
in the info being given to it: