Re: [OMPI devel] psm mtl weirdness

2015-09-08 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hi Howard, Is this new behavior? Do you see the error if you set PSM_DEVICES=shm,self ? The PSM MTL should be setting this on its own, but maybe something changed. Andrew From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Howard Pritchard Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 10:06 AM

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.10.0 issue

2015-09-04 Thread Friedley, Andrew
but I think that should > happen > now (unless psm2 was set to auto-build if the lib was detected). Regardless, > we can always have RH et al simply build with —enable-mca-no-build=mtl- > psm2 and that will solve the problem. > > Please keep us posted - and thanks! > Ralph >

[OMPI devel] master seg fault in CM PML

2015-06-09 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hi, I'm seeing an issue running various tests from the Intel MPI test suite. Has anyone else seen this? Any ideas? RHEL7, master git hash 090922887b92c9764cc5, no CFLAGS set, no special configure options. The mpirun command and output are included below. Failure happens with '-mca pml cm

Re: [OMPI devel] Hang in IMB-RMA?

2015-05-12 Thread Friedley, Andrew
t; To: Open MPI Developers > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Hang in IMB-RMA? > > > Thanks for the report. Can you try with master and see if the issue is fixed > there? > > -Nathan > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:38:01PM +, Friedley, Andrew wrote: > > Hi,

[OMPI devel] Hang in IMB-RMA?

2015-05-12 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hi, I've run into a problem with the IMB-RMA exchange_get test. At this point I suspect it's an issue in Open MPI or the test itself. Could someone take a look? I'm running Open MPI 1.8.5 and IMB 4.0.2. MVAPICH2 is able to run all of IMB-RMA successfully. mpirun -np 4 -mca pml ob1 -mca

Re: [OMPI devel] psm and process affinity in open mpi

2015-03-03 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hi Howard, The PSM MTL sets PSM_EP_OPEN_AFFINITY_SKIP, so if I understand right, OMPI already has the fix for you. Andrew From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Howard Pritchard Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 8:21 AM To: Open MPI Developers List Subject: [OMPI devel] psm

Re: [OMPI devel] For discussion tomorrow: MTL issues

2015-01-29 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Is there anything written up about recent Open MPI one-sided work? Looking for something beyond just the code that I can study up on.. papers, design docs, future plans, etc. Andrew > -Original Message- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff > Squyres

Re: [OMPI devel] MTL interfaces

2015-01-28 Thread Friedley, Andrew
I care and can attend at that time. Andrew > -Original Message- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff > Squyres (jsquyres) > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 1:56 PM > To: Open MPI Developers List > Subject: [OMPI devel] MTL interfaces > > Ryan / Sandia

Re: [OMPI devel] Changed behaviour with PSM on master

2015-01-09 Thread Friedley, Andrew
No this is not expected behavior. The PSM MTL code has not changed in 2 months, when I fixed that unused variable warning for you. That suggests something above the PSM MTL broke things. I see no reason your older software install should suddenly stopping working if all you are updating is

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.8.3 and PSM errors

2014-11-11 Thread Friedley, Andrew
gt; > Which is why I thought PSM can’t be used for dynamic operations at all, > including comm_spawn and connect/accept > > > > On Nov 11, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > > > On Nov 11, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Fri

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.8.3 and PSM errors

2014-11-11 Thread Friedley, Andrew
OK, I'm able to reproduce this now, not sure why I couldn't before. I took a look at the diff of the PSM MTL from 1.6.5 to 1.8.1, and nothing is standing out to me. Question more for the general group: Did anything related to the behavior/usage of MTL add_procs() change in this time window?

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.8.3 and PSM errors

2014-11-10 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Adrian > Reber > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 1:19 PM > To: Open MPI Developers > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] 1.8.3 and PSM errors > > What is IFS? > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:12:41PM +, Friedley, Andrew wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > Yes, I sug

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.8.3 and PSM errors

2014-11-10 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hat, Inc. > URL : http://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/infinipath-psm/infinipath- > psm-3.2-2_ga8c3e3e_open.tar.gz > Summary : QLogic PSM Libraries > > Is this supposed to work? Or is this something Red Hat has to fix? > > Adrian > &g

Re: [OMPI devel] enable-smp-locks affects PSM performance

2014-11-03 Thread Friedley, Andrew
devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff > Squyres (jsquyres) > Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 7:49 AM > To: Open MPI Developers List > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] enable-smp-locks affects PSM performance > > On Nov 3, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Friedley, Andrew <andrew.

Re: [OMPI devel] enable-smp-locks affects PSM performance

2014-11-03 Thread Friedley, Andrew
ive, if you *know* you've got a data structure that does not need the > added thread-safety protections, you can use the unsafe-but-faster > versions. > > > > > On Oct 30, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Friedley, Andrew > <andrew.fried...@intel.com> wrote: > > >

[OMPI devel] enable-smp-locks affects PSM performance

2014-10-30 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hi, I'm reporting a performance (message rate 16%, latency 3%) regression when using PSM that occurred between OMPI v1.6.5 and v1.8.1. I would guess it affects other networks too, but I haven't tested. The problem stems from the --enable-smp-locks and --enable-opal-multi-threads options.

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.8.3 and PSM errors

2014-10-27 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hi Adrian, I'm unable to reproduce here with OMPI v1.8.3 (I assume you're doing this with one 8-core node): $ mpirun -np 32 -mca pml cm -mca mtl psm ./mpi_test_suite -t "environment" (Rank:0) tst_test_array[0]:Status (Rank:0) tst_test_array[1]:Request_Null (Rank:0) tst_test_array[2]:Type_dup

Re: [OMPI devel] Calendar appointment coming to the list

2014-06-26 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Is there any prior written outline/discussion on this topic that someone could point me to? Any plans to apply this work to the MTLs as well? Thanks, Andrew > -Original Message- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff > Squyres (jsquyres) > Sent: Thursday,

Re: [OMPI devel] OMPI v1.8.x git tags?

2014-05-13 Thread Friedley, Andrew
dd <jladd.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Yes. Will look into it. > > > > Josh > > > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) > <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Ah; I guess the tags aren't getting pulled over. > >

[OMPI devel] OMPI v1.8.x git tags?

2014-05-12 Thread Friedley, Andrew
Hi, I'm looking at the OMPI svn mirror on github and there don't appear to be any release tags for v1.8.x; the most recent appears to be v1.7.2. Are there any plans to add tags for any more releases? Thanks, Andrew