We have chosen to use the __sync builtins by default on master. There was an
rfc on it awhile ago. Is there a good reason to go back to the inline by
default or is this just surprising?
From: devel on behalf of Paul Hargrove
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016
Nevermind. Looks like there are two different macros for 64-bit and one is
wrong in this case. Fix incoming.
From: devel on behalf of Gilles Gouaillardet
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 2:22:24 AM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Master
This really isnt a problem with the atomics code. We have a macro to indicate
whether 64-bit is really supported. Something in opal is using 64-bit atomics
without checking if they are supported. With sync atomics we get a link error
but with the others it is a compile error. I fixed a similar
It will take about 5 mins to either fix or determine if more work is needed.
From: devel on behalf of Howard Pritchard
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:05:24 AM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI commits] Git: open-mpi/ompi branch
Yes. Usnic, yoda, and smcuda need to be updated for the new interface. The
warnings in opening I will fix.
From: devel on behalf of Ralph Castain
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:15:07 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: [OMPI devel] Fwd: [OMPI
I will try to take a look this week and see what I can do.
-Nathan
From: devel [devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of George Bosilca
[bosi...@icl.utk.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 10:37 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC:
