On 17-Jul-11 5:50 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Are you saying that you don't link against symbols from that header file --
> you only use struct definitions / #defines ? If so, then I would agree --
> it's not necessary.
I'm using macros, data types and inline functions that work on
these data
Are you saying that you don't link against symbols from that header file -- you
only use struct definitions / #defines ? If so, then I would agree -- it's not
necessary.
Can you confirm?
On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 14-Jul-11 5:26 PM, Jeff Squyres
Hi Jeff,
On 14-Jul-11 5:26 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>
>> Also, besides checking if compilation works (assuming that I get
>> this file), I have no way checking if linkage also works...
>
> You can AC_LINK_IFELSE to see if the symbols you
On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Also, besides checking if compilation works (assuming that I get
> this file), I have no way checking if linkage also works...
You can AC_LINK_IFELSE to see if the symbols you need are in the libraries.
Er... I'm sorry, I should have
On 14-Jul-11 4:38 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
>
>
> On 7/14/2011 9:17 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>> On 14-Jul-11 3:30 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required
>>> for Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is
>>>
On 7/14/2011 9:17 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
On 14-Jul-11 3:30 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required for
Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is worthwhile. If
not, then perhaps a separate port will be
On 7/14/2011 9:30 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
On 14-Jul-11 4:21 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 11:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
On 14-Jul-11 4:21 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
>
>
> On 7/13/2011 11:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>> [adding Terry]
>>
>> On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
>>> On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>>> Finally, are you sure
On 7/13/2011 11:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h exists on all
platforms? (e.g.,
On 14-Jul-11 3:30 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required for
> Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is worthwhile.
> If not, then perhaps a separate port will be required for Solaris to support
> the dynamic
The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required for
Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is worthwhile. If
not, then perhaps a separate port will be required for Solaris to support the
dynamic SL functionality.
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:24 AM,
I do but my machine room's power is down so I don't have access to it
right now. I will grope around once it comes up to see what it has. I
also have sent email to our IB team for some direction.
--td
On 7/14/2011 2:42 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM,
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
>> On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h exists on
> all platforms? (e.g., Solaris) I know you said you don't
On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h
exists on all platforms? (e.g., Solaris) I know you said you don't
have any Solaris machines to test with, but you should ping Oracle
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h exists on all
platforms? (e.g., Solaris) I know you said you don't have any Solaris machines
to test with, but you should ping Oracle directly for some testing -- Terry might
Hi Jeff,
Just checked in r24900.
On 09-Jul-11 2:24 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I'm still getting warnings about OMPI_ENABLE_DYNAMIC_SL not being defined,
> even though I see this in my configure output:
>
> checking if can use dynamic SL support... yes
>
> That's why I wanted that macro
I'm still getting warnings about OMPI_ENABLE_DYNAMIC_SL not being defined, even
though I see this in my configure output:
checking if can use dynamic SL support... yes
That's why I wanted that macro *always* defined by the m4 (to either 0 or 1) --
not just defining it or not. This is one of
Hi Jeff,
On 02-Jul-11 11:52 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Were all the issueswith this code fixed? There were m4 issues and solaris
> issues, IIRC.
I took all the fixes I could find based on the trac:
"Be sure also to look at r24196; Josh committed a
bunch of warning fixes for you
18 matches
Mail list logo
