On 17-Jul-11 5:50 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Are you saying that you don't link against symbols from that header file --
> you only use struct definitions / #defines ? If so, then I would agree --
> it's not necessary.
I'm using macros, data types and inline functions that work on
these data typ
Are you saying that you don't link against symbols from that header file -- you
only use struct definitions / #defines ? If so, then I would agree -- it's not
necessary.
Can you confirm?
On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 14-Jul-11 5:26 PM, Jeff Squyres
Hi Jeff,
On 14-Jul-11 5:26 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>
>> Also, besides checking if compilation works (assuming that I get
>> this file), I have no way checking if linkage also works...
>
> You can AC_LINK_IFELSE to see if the symbols you ne
On Jul 14, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Also, besides checking if compilation works (assuming that I get
> this file), I have no way checking if linkage also works...
You can AC_LINK_IFELSE to see if the symbols you need are in the libraries.
Er... I'm sorry, I should have not
On 14-Jul-11 4:38 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
>
>
> On 7/14/2011 9:17 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>> On 14-Jul-11 3:30 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required
>>> for Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is
>>> w
On 7/14/2011 9:17 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
On 14-Jul-11 3:30 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required for
Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is worthwhile. If
not, then perhaps a separate port will be req
On 7/14/2011 9:30 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
On 14-Jul-11 4:21 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 11:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
On 14-Jul-11 4:21 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
>
>
> On 7/13/2011 11:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>> [adding Terry]
>>
>> On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
>>> On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>>> Finally, are you sure t
On 7/13/2011 11:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h exists on all
platforms? (e.g., S
On 14-Jul-11 3:30 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required for
> Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is worthwhile.
> If not, then perhaps a separate port will be required for Solaris to support
> the dynamic SL
The real question is: does Solaris have the same data structures required for
Linux's dynamic SL support? If so, this header file inquiry is worthwhile. If
not, then perhaps a separate port will be required for Solaris to support the
dynamic SL functionality.
On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Ter
I do but my machine room's power is down so I don't have access to it
right now. I will grope around once it comes up to see what it has. I
also have sent email to our IB team for some direction.
--td
On 7/14/2011 2:42 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugen
[adding Terry]
On 14-Jul-11 2:49 AM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
>> On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h exists on
> all platforms? (e.g., Solaris) I know you said you don't ha
On 7/13/2011 4:31 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h
exists on all platforms? (e.g., Solaris) I know you said you don't
have any Solaris machines to test with, but you should ping Oracle
d
On 7/13/2011 4:20 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Finally, are you sure that infiniband/complib/cl_types_osd.h exists on all
platforms? (e.g., Solaris) I know you said you don't have any Solaris machines
to test with, but you should ping Oracle directly for some testing -- Terry might
no
Hi Jeff,
Just checked in r24900.
On 09-Jul-11 2:24 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I'm still getting warnings about OMPI_ENABLE_DYNAMIC_SL not being defined,
> even though I see this in my configure output:
>
> checking if can use dynamic SL support... yes
>
> That's why I wanted that macro *always*
I'm still getting warnings about OMPI_ENABLE_DYNAMIC_SL not being defined, even
though I see this in my configure output:
checking if can use dynamic SL support... yes
That's why I wanted that macro *always* defined by the m4 (to either 0 or 1) --
not just defining it or not. This is one of th
Hi Jeff,
On 02-Jul-11 11:52 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Were all the issueswith this code fixed? There were m4 issues and solaris
> issues, IIRC.
I took all the fixes I could find based on the trac:
"Be sure also to look at r24196; Josh committed a
bunch of warning fixes for you aft
Were all the issueswith this code fixed? There were m4 issues and solaris
issues, IIRC.
Sent from my phone. No type good.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:28 AM, "klit...@osl.iu.edu" wrote:
> Author: kliteyn
> Date: 2011-06-28 10:28:29 EDT (Tue, 28 Jun 2011)
> New Revision: 24830
> URL: https://svn.op
19 matches
Mail list logo
