I vote for it.
- Galen
On 10/11/07 5:32 PM, "George Bosilca" wrote:
> Sounds perfect. I'll vote for it.
>
>Thanks,
> george.
>
> On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:17 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>>
>>> I know that [with few exception] nobo
On Oct 12, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
Will these new scripts be using the same wrapper config files as the
binaries were?
I would hope so -- I think that the scripts would pretty much do
exactly the same thing as the current .c source.
--td
Richard Graham wrote:
What: Change
Will these new scripts be using the same wrapper config files as the
binaries were?
--td
Richard Graham wrote:
What: Change the mpicc/mpicxx/mpif77/mpif90 from being binaries to being
shell scripts
Why: Our build environment assumes that wrapper compilers will use the same
binary format that
Sounds perfect. I'll vote for it.
Thanks,
george.
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:17 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows
support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack
there and
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:17 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows
support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack
there and this approach will definitively break our "Unix like"
friendliness on Windows.
As a temporary solutio
I know that [with few exception] nobody cares about our Windows
support, but we finally have a working Open MPI software stack there
and this approach will definitively break our "Unix like"
friendliness on Windows.
As a temporary solution and until we can figure out how many people
use m
What: Change the mpicc/mpicxx/mpif77/mpif90 from being binaries to being
shell scripts
Why: Our build environment assumes that wrapper compilers will use the same
binary format that the Open MPI libraries do. In cross-compile environment,
the MPI wrapper compilers will run on the front-end and n
