On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:27:00 -0500
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
>
> > Sorry, late to the discussion. This is a spurious warning caused by
> > passing the NULL pointer to the opal free function which is
> > actually ok. It was fixed by #2884 - this is
On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> Sorry, late to the discussion. This is a spurious warning caused by
> passing the NULL pointer to the opal free function which is actually ok.
> It was fixed by #2884 - this is why you don't see the problem in trunk.
I have a dim recollection
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:46:08 +0200
Mike Dubman wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The latest v1.5 from trunk, compiled in debug mode yields following
> error with openib.
> The quick blame leads to the following commit:
>
> r25616 | bosilca | 2011-12-10 00:18:16 +0200 (Sat, 10 Dec 2011) | 4
> line
We decided on the call to just roll this back for 1.5.5, and fully
investigate/fix for 1.6.
On Dec 13, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Mike Dubman wrote:
> btw, it appears, that problem happens when CFLAGS="-g -O0" during configure
> phase.
> another clone compiled w/o this option did not cry.
>
> On Tue,
btw, it appears, that problem happens when CFLAGS="-g -O0" during configure
phase.
another clone compiled w/o this option did not cry.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:10 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> We are investigating. A fix will be hopefully provided soon.
>
> Thanks for the report,
> george.
>
>
We are investigating. A fix will be hopefully provided soon.
Thanks for the report,
george.
On Dec 13, 2011, at 00:25 , Mike Dubman wrote:
> nope
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:40 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Do we have the same issue in the trunk?
>
> george.
>
> On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:4
nope
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:40 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Do we have the same issue in the trunk?
>
> george.
>
> On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:49 , Mike Dubman wrote:
>
> after removing my debug prints - the correct line is 448
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Mike Dubman wrote:
>
>>
>>
Do we have the same issue in the trunk?
george.
On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:49 , Mike Dubman wrote:
> after removing my debug prints - the correct line is 448
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Mike Dubman wrote:
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> The latest v1.5 from trunk, compiled in debug mode yields
after removing my debug prints - the correct line is 448
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Mike Dubman wrote:
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> The latest v1.5 from trunk, compiled in debug mode yields following error
> with openib.
> The quick blame leads to the following commit:
>
> r25616 | bosilca | 2011-12
Hi guys,
The latest v1.5 from trunk, compiled in debug mode yields following error
with openib.
The quick blame leads to the following commit:
r25616 | bosilca | 2011-12-10 00:18:16 +0200 (Sat, 10 Dec 2011) | 4 lines
Fixes #2930: CMR: memcpy() w/overlapping addresses in
btl_openib_connect_oob.c
P
10 matches
Mail list logo