On Aug 21, 2009, at 07:33 , Ralph Castain wrote:
Hi Rich
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:14 AM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
I have several questions here - since process migration is an open
research question,
and there is more than one way to address the issue -
- Is this being implemented as a
Hi Rich
On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:14 AM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
I have several questions here - since process migration is an open
research question,
and there is more than one way to address the issue -
- Is this being implemented as a component, so that other approaches
can be used ?
I have several questions here - since process migration is an open research
question,
and there is more than one way to address the issue -
- Is this being implemented as a component, so that other approaches can be
used ?
- If so, what sort of component interface is being considered ?
-
Hmmm...I'm afraid I cannot entirely substantiate your concerns.
Everything compiles just fine for me under both Linux and OSX. True,
the files are not completely instantiated on the trunk at this time,
but they also are not activated on the trunk for precisely that reason.
Can you provide
Ralph,
I'm a little bit concerned about the commits stated below as their
quality doesn't match the usual quality standards of the trunk. There
are several issues: mostly empty files, names coming from other
frameworks, failure to compile on several platforms (including Linux
and MAC OS
