I'm checking with slurm the exact "task_per_node" and "cpus_per_task"
behavior, for present and future Slurm version.
Ralph Castain a écrit :
We've gone around on this one a few times too. We finally settled on the
current formula and confirmed it did what the slurm folks expected, so I'm
We've gone around on this one a few times too. We finally settled on the
current formula and confirmed it did what the slurm folks expected, so I'm
somewhat loath to change it given that situation.
I suggest you take it up with the slurm folks to find out what behavior is
expected when
Hi Ralph,
I find a minor bug on the MCA composent: ras slurm.
This one have an incorrect comportement with the "X number of processors
per task" feature.
On the file orte/mca/ras/slurm/ras_slurm_module.c, line 356:
- The node slot number is divide with "cpus_per_task" information,
but
